Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB2076 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 By: Brown of Kaufman H.B. No. 2076
22
33
44 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
55 AN ACT
66 relating to the impact of the presence of certain peace officers on
77 the admissibility of certain statements made by children.
88 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
99 SECTION 1. Section 5(a), Article 38.071, Code of Criminal
1010 Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
1111 (a) On the motion of the attorney representing the state or
1212 the attorney representing the defendant and on a finding by the
1313 court that the following requirements have been substantially
1414 satisfied, the recording of an oral statement of the child made
1515 before a complaint has been filed or an indictment returned is
1616 admissible into evidence if:
1717 (1) no attorney or active, appointed peace officer was
1818 present when the statement was made;
1919 (2) the recording is both visual and aural and is
2020 recorded on film or videotape or by other electronic means;
2121 (3) the recording equipment was capable of making an
2222 accurate recording, the operator of the equipment was competent,
2323 the quality of the recording is sufficient to allow the court and
2424 the finder of fact to assess the demeanor of the child and the
2525 interviewer, and the recording is accurate and has not been
2626 altered;
2727 (4) the statement was not made in response to
2828 questioning calculated to lead the child to make a particular
2929 statement;
3030 (5) every voice on the recording is identified;
3131 (6) the person conducting the interview of the child
3232 in the recording is expert in the handling, treatment, and
3333 investigation of child abuse cases, present at the hearing or
3434 proceeding, called by the state, and subject to cross-examination;
3535 (7) immediately after a complaint was filed or an
3636 indictment returned, the attorney representing the state notified
3737 the court, the defendant, and the attorney representing the
3838 defendant of the existence of the recording;
3939 (8) the defendant, the attorney for the defendant, and
4040 the expert witnesses for the defendant were afforded an opportunity
4141 to view the recording before it is offered into evidence and, if a
4242 proceeding was requested as provided by Subsection (b) [of this
4343 section], in a proceeding conducted before a district court judge
4444 but outside the presence of the jury were afforded an opportunity to
4545 cross-examine the child as provided by Subsection (b) [of this
4646 section] from any time immediately following the filing of the
4747 complaint or the returning of an indictment charging the defendant
4848 until the date the hearing or proceeding begins;
4949 (9) the recording of the cross-examination, if there
5050 is one, is admissible under Subsection (b) [of this section];
5151 (10) before giving his testimony, the child was placed
5252 under oath or was otherwise admonished in a manner appropriate to
5353 the child's age and maturity to testify truthfully;
5454 (11) the court finds from the recording or through an
5555 in camera examination of the child that the child was competent to
5656 testify at the time that the recording was made; and
5757 (12) only one continuous recording of the child was
5858 made or the necessity for pauses in the recordings or for multiple
5959 recordings has been established at the hearing or proceeding.
6060 SECTION 2. This Act applies only to the admissibility of a
6161 recorded oral statement at a hearing or proceeding that commences
6262 on or after the effective date of this Act, regardless of whether
6363 the statement was made before, on, or after that date.
6464 SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.