Texas House Bill HB2158

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the imposition of a cost on conviction to pay expenses related to DNA collection or analysis.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2158 is expected to significantly affect law enforcement practices and the judicial system in Texas. By instituting these costs, the legislation aims to deter criminal activity through a financial disincentive, as well as provide funding for ongoing DNA collection and analysis efforts. Furthermore, this will enable courts to recoup a portion of the expenditures spent on these forensic processes, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of criminal proceedings, particularly in cases where DNA evidence plays a crucial role.

Summary

House Bill 2158 proposes amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure concerning the costs associated with DNA collection or analysis when a person is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor. Under this bill, the financial burden for DNA testing expenses incurred during criminal investigations is shifted to the convicted individuals. Specifically, the bill details a reduced cost of $60 for felonies and $30 for misdemeanors associated with DNA analyses, down from previous higher amounts. This change aims to align the costs more closely with the administrative expenses of collecting and processing DNA, thereby streamlining both legislative and enforcement approaches to crime and conviction in relation to DNA evidence.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 2158 seeks to enhance Texas' legal framework concerning DNA-related costs, with the potential for both financial and social implications. As discussions evolve around this bill, a balanced approach is necessary to ensure that while criminal justice can be effectively funded, it does not inadvertently exacerbate existing social inequalities.

Contention

Despite the intended benefits of increased efficiency and streamlined costs, the bill has faced concerns from civil rights advocates who argue that such fees could disproportionately burden low-income defendants. Critics posit that charging defendants for DNA processing could lead to inequities in how justice is administered, particularly for those unable to afford these additional costs. This point of contention raises broader questions about access to justice and whether financial barriers might further complicate individuals' situations in the criminal justice system.