Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB4396

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to setting a prudent uniform standard for the retail display of aerosol paint; and providing for the collection and distribution of a surcharge on such paint for purpose of preventing graffiti vandalism and repairing damage there from.

Impact

The bill amends Chapter 485 of the Health and Safety Code by adding a new section that articulates the collection of a 25-cent surcharge on aerosol paint sold in retail settings. Proceeds from this surcharge will be allocated directly to the general revenue fund, but specifically earmarked for anti-graffiti education, enforcement, and abatement efforts. This financial framework aims to provide local jurisdictions with resources to mount more effective responses to graffiti-related challenges.

Summary

House Bill 4396 introduces regulations concerning the retail display of aerosol paint, aimed specifically at preventing graffiti vandalism. The bill establishes a uniform standard for how aerosol paint should be sold and displayed in retail environments across Texas. In an effort to combat the costs and damage associated with graffiti, the bill mandates a surcharge on each can of aerosol paint sold, facilitating a financial mechanism to support local governments in their anti-graffiti endeavors.

Conclusion

Ultimately, HB4396 reflects a proactive legislative response to the issues of graffiti vandalism through a structured financial initiative. By securing dedicated funding for anti-graffiti measures, the bill aims to enhance community efforts in maintaining public spaces. However, the success of this legislative effort will likely depend on the implementation details and the engagement of local authorities in utilizing the funds efficiently.

Contention

Discussion surrounding HB4396 may highlight points of contention regarding the appropriateness of imposing a surcharge on consumers and the overall effectiveness of the bill in addressing graffiti vandalism. Critics could argue that this approach might not sufficiently mitigate graffiti problems and question the extent to which these funds will be utilized effectively by local authorities. Furthermore, the implications of regulating aerosol paint displays may concern retailers about compliance burdens and potential impacts on sales.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.