Texas House Bill HCR75

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Introduced: 2/25/09
• Refer: 3/2/09
• Report Pass: 3/30/09

Caption

Urging congress to explore alternatives to border security in South Texas other than the fencing described in the Secure Fence Act.

Impact

The bill articulates concerns that a border wall would have profound ecological consequences. It notes that many protected wildlife areas, such as the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge and the Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, could be severely impacted. The resolution argues that years of ecological restoration efforts could be undone, harming ecosystems that support endangered species and disrupting vital migration patterns for numerous wildlife. Furthermore, the potential increase in soil erosion along the floodplain and limited wildlife access to the Rio Grande would pose significant environmental challenges.

Summary

HCR75 is a concurrent resolution introduced during the 81st Legislature of Texas, urging Congress to reconsider the implementation of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 in South Texas. The resolution highlights the importance of the Lower Rio Grande Valley as a unique agricultural region with significant natural resources and diverse wildlife. It asserts that the proposed construction of a border fence could have detrimental effects on both the local economy and the environment. The resolution emphasizes that the fence threatens agriculture by obstructing access to water, limits opportunities for businesses that serve Mexican nationals, and risks the loss of property for local landowners.

Contention

A substantial focus of HCR75 is on the economic implications of constructing a border fence. The resolution presents stark statistics regarding the estimated cost of the fence, which could reach up to $49 billion over 25 years, indicating that such expenditure would be an inefficient use of taxpayer money for a border strategy that may not significantly reduce illegal crossings. This financial perspective is coupled with concerns over cultural diplomacy, suggesting that erecting a border wall could send a negative message to Mexico and may lead to lasting negative impacts on cultural and economic ties.

Final_point

In conclusion, this resolution serves as a call to action for Congressional reconsideration of border security measures in South Texas. It not only highlights the local economic and environmental stakes involved but also emphasizes the need for a more diplomatic and effective approach to border security, suggesting that alternative strategies should be explored to maintain both national security and the integrity of the communities along the Texas-Mexico border.