Texas House Bill HJR127

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/5/09
• Voted on by House: 5/12/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/09
• Sent toSOS: 6/3/09
• Enrolled: 6/1/09

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.

Impact

If enacted, HJR127 would amend existing state constitutional provisions regarding office holding for military personnel. This change could have significant implications for how military members engage in state governance, particularly in allowing active military members to also serve in local or state offices. The amendment may encourage greater representation of military perspectives in civil decision-making by enabling active members to simultaneously fulfill civil duties.

Summary

HJR127 proposes a constitutional amendment that enables officers or enlisted members of the Texas State Guard and other state militia or military forces to hold civil offices simultaneously. This amendment seeks to modify Section 40(a) of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, which currently restricts an individual from holding more than one civil office of emolument at the same time, with specific exceptions. The proposal aims to expand these exceptions to include personnel from the Texas State Guard and similar organizations, thereby allowing them to participate in civil governance while serving in military capacities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HJR127 might include concerns regarding the dual roles of military and civilian duties. Opponents might argue that holding both military and civil offices could lead to conflicts of interest, particularly when military goals and civic responsibilities diverge. However, proponents could assert that military service equips individuals with valuable experiences and insights that can benefit civil governance. As the bill has bipartisan support, any debate likely centers on the balance between military obligations and civil responsibilities rather than outright opposition.