Texas House Bill HJR24

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to a moratorium on the execution of persons convicted of capital offenses.

Impact

If enacted, this amendment would impact the application of capital punishment in Texas by instituting a temporary halt on executions, prompting discussions on the effectiveness and morality of the death penalty. The measure has the potential to influence public opinion as well as the broader discourse on criminal justice reforms. Discussions surrounding the bill may lead to a reevaluation of the state's approach to capital offenses, including considerations of wrongful convictions and the fairness of the judicial process. Setting a precedent for moratoriums could also inspire similar legislative movements in other states, underscoring the national debate on the death penalty.

Summary

HJR24 proposes a constitutional amendment to establish a moratorium on the execution of individuals convicted of capital offenses in Texas. This resolution aims to amend Section 11 of Article IV of the Texas Constitution by introducing a new provision that allows the Governor to issue an order that prevents the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from carrying out executions. The moratorium would remain in effect until the order is revoked by the current or succeeding Governor. This legislative initiative highlights a significant policy shift regarding capital punishment in the state, bringing attention to the ethical implications of executing individuals convicted of serious crimes.

Contention

HJR24 may provoke notable contention among various stakeholders. Proponents argue that a moratorium is a necessary step to ensure justice is served fairly and to prevent possible wrongful executions, especially considering the irreversible nature of capital punishment. Conversely, opponents may view this move as undermining the legal and judicial finality of capital sentences, arguing that it could result in a lack of accountability for serious crimes. The dialogue surrounding HJR24 will likely bring to the forefront contrasting ideologies on criminal justice, victim rights, and the sanctity of life.