1 | 1 | | By: Coleman H.R. No. 709 |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | |
---|
4 | 4 | | R E S O L U T I O N |
---|
5 | 5 | | WHEREAS, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 |
---|
6 | 6 | | (Recovery Act) was enacted by the Congress and approved by the |
---|
7 | 7 | | President of the United States on February 17, 2009, to, among other |
---|
8 | 8 | | things, "preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery [;] |
---|
9 | 9 | | assist those most impacted by the recession[; and] invest in |
---|
10 | 10 | | transportation, environmental protection and other infrastructure |
---|
11 | 11 | | that will provide long-term economic benefits;" and |
---|
12 | 12 | | WHEREAS, the Recovery Act provides that its appropriated |
---|
13 | 13 | | funds shall be used to achieve the Act's purposes "as quickly as |
---|
14 | 14 | | possible consistent with prudent management;" and |
---|
15 | 15 | | WHEREAS, Texas is entitled to approximately $2.2 billion in |
---|
16 | 16 | | funds under the Recovery Act for transportation projects in this |
---|
17 | 17 | | State, out of which approximately $500 million will be directly |
---|
18 | 18 | | provided to local authorities; and |
---|
19 | 19 | | WHEREAS, the Recovery Act directs the State to consider and |
---|
20 | 20 | | prioritize designated criteria in approving transportation |
---|
21 | 21 | | construction projects in order to better achieve the overall goals |
---|
22 | 22 | | of the Act; and |
---|
23 | 23 | | WHEREAS, Texas has a backlog of transportation |
---|
24 | 24 | | infrastructure projects to ease the increasing highway congestion, |
---|
25 | 25 | | both in magnitude and geography, that the State has experienced for |
---|
26 | 26 | | the past three decades, with traffic delay in the State's urban |
---|
27 | 27 | | areas increasing more than 500 percent in the last two decades; and |
---|
28 | 28 | | WHEREAS, the Act allows the Texas Transportation Commission |
---|
29 | 29 | | (commission) and the Texas Department of Transportation |
---|
30 | 30 | | (department) 120 days from the date of the President's approval (or |
---|
31 | 31 | | not earlier than June 17, 2009) to obligate 50 percent of all money |
---|
32 | 32 | | provided under the Recovery Act to the State for transportation |
---|
33 | 33 | | projects; and |
---|
34 | 34 | | WHEREAS, the Act allows the commission and department 365 |
---|
35 | 35 | | days from the date of the President's approval (or not earlier than |
---|
36 | 36 | | February 17, 2010) to obligate the remaining 50 percent of the money |
---|
37 | 37 | | provided under the Recovery Act to the State for transportation |
---|
38 | 38 | | projects; and |
---|
39 | 39 | | WHEREAS, the commission and the department have testified |
---|
40 | 40 | | before a committee of the House that the obligation process for the |
---|
41 | 41 | | first $500 million of the State's total $1.7 billion share of |
---|
42 | 42 | | Recovery Fund money for transportation was approved on February 26, |
---|
43 | 43 | | 2009, for maintenance related projects, with no consideration of |
---|
44 | 44 | | the priorities listed in the Act, and without specific information |
---|
45 | 45 | | by project so that the Legislature and the public could evaluate how |
---|
46 | 46 | | the projects will maximize job creation and stimulate the Texas |
---|
47 | 47 | | economy toward achieving the goals of the Act; and |
---|
48 | 48 | | WHEREAS, the commission and the department have announced |
---|
49 | 49 | | their intent to begin the obligation process for the remaining $1.2 |
---|
50 | 50 | | billion of the State's share of Recovery Act transportation funds |
---|
51 | 51 | | for new construction projects on March 5, 2009; and |
---|
52 | 52 | | WHEREAS, the commission and the department are unable to |
---|
53 | 53 | | provide the House with sufficient information on the criteria by |
---|
54 | 54 | | which projects, both maintenance and new construction, were |
---|
55 | 55 | | selected; and |
---|
56 | 56 | | WHEREAS, the commission and the department have not been able |
---|
57 | 57 | | to clearly articulate how each project will spur a growth in jobs, |
---|
58 | 58 | | how each project will make a meaningful investment in the long-term |
---|
59 | 59 | | development of the State's transportation infrastructure |
---|
60 | 60 | | development, or how each project was prioritized to meet the |
---|
61 | 61 | | requirements of the Recovery Act; and |
---|
62 | 62 | | WHEREAS, it is exceedingly clear that the commission and |
---|
63 | 63 | | department are making a rush to judgment in obligating Recovery Act |
---|
64 | 64 | | money without providing a rational basis for those actions, |
---|
65 | 65 | | obtaining the advice and input of Members of the Legislature, or |
---|
66 | 66 | | assuring transparency and accountability in their decision-making |
---|
67 | 67 | | process; |
---|
68 | 68 | | WHEREAS, it is the duty of the legislative branch to make all |
---|
69 | 69 | | necessary provisions for the public good; |
---|
70 | 70 | | WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to ensure that Recovery |
---|
71 | 71 | | Act money is used to further the Act's purposes; and |
---|
72 | 72 | | WHEREAS, the House serves this public interest by providing |
---|
73 | 73 | | unambiguous direction to the commission and the department before |
---|
74 | 74 | | the irrevocable obligation of Recovery Act funds; now, therefore, |
---|
75 | 75 | | be it |
---|
76 | 76 | | RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the 81st Texas |
---|
77 | 77 | | Legislature: |
---|
78 | 78 | | (1) urges that the Texas Transportation Commission, the |
---|
79 | 79 | | executive director of the Texas Department of Transportation, and |
---|
80 | 80 | | all department employees take no steps to irrevocably obligate any |
---|
81 | 81 | | Recovery Act funds until the commission and the department can |
---|
82 | 82 | | articulate a rational basis for the priorities used to select the |
---|
83 | 83 | | projects for the initial $500 million funding by Recovery Act |
---|
84 | 84 | | funds. |
---|
85 | 85 | | (2) requests the commission and the department provide the |
---|
86 | 86 | | House with a complete explanation of the project selection criteria |
---|
87 | 87 | | and its practical application, including how the commission and the |
---|
88 | 88 | | department considered the purposes and criteria of the Recovery |
---|
89 | 89 | | Act, and specifically including the Act's provisions directing that |
---|
90 | 90 | | funding priority be given to certain projects, and the data |
---|
91 | 91 | | concerning which projects most maximize job creation and long-term |
---|
92 | 92 | | economic stimulus. |
---|
93 | 93 | | (3) insists that the commission and department act |
---|
94 | 94 | | prudently in obligating Recovery Act money and in discharging its |
---|
95 | 95 | | fiduciary responsibilities to the people of Texas with particular |
---|
96 | 96 | | attention to transparency and accountability in all aspects of the |
---|
97 | 97 | | selection of projects and the obligation and expenditure of |
---|
98 | 98 | | Recovery Act funds. |
---|
99 | 99 | | (4) calls on the commission and the department to allow time |
---|
100 | 100 | | for meaningful input from elected officials at all levels of State |
---|
101 | 101 | | government. |
---|
102 | 102 | | (5) asserts that nothing in this resolution shall be |
---|
103 | 103 | | construed to authorize the commission or the department to take any |
---|
104 | 104 | | immediate action obligating Recovery Act funds. |
---|