Texas Senate Bill SB1122

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/30/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/9/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/4/09
• Voted on by House: 5/12/09
• Governor Action: 5/27/09
• Enrolled: 5/18/09
• Passed: 5/27/09

Caption

Relating to the requirement to keep records of game bird or animal carcasses placed in a cold storage or processing facility.

Impact

One of the major implications of SB1122 is that it delineates the requirements for maintaining records related to game animals and birds placed in public cold storage or processing facilities. While private, family-owned facilities are generally exempt unless situated on a hunting lease, public facilities must manage and record details about the carcasses they handle. By instituting these requirements, the bill aims to promote greater accountability within the wildlife management sector and enhance compliance with state laws.

Summary

SB1122 aims to amend existing provisions in the Parks and Wildlife Code regarding the management of game bird and animal carcasses in cold storage or processing facilities. The bill clarifies the definitions of key terms related to the carcass processing procedure, specifically 'quartering', which refers to the breaking down of an animal into its major body parts. This legislative change seeks to establish more precise guidelines for game storage and processing, ensuring that operators adhere to consistent and clear standards.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SB1122 represents a step towards more comprehensive oversight of game animal carcasses in Texas. By updating record-keeping practices and definitions in the law, lawmakers aim to adapt to changing wildlife management needs, while also mitigating risks associated with improper handling. Thus, the bill could significantly influence both operational standards and conservation efforts within the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB1122 include the balance between regulation and personal freedom. Advocates argue that these changes are necessary to prevent mishandling of game animals and to facilitate better tracking of wildlife resources. However, opponents may express concerns regarding the potential bureaucratic burden on small, local operators who might find the record-keeping requirements to be excessive. The challenges of implementation in diverse storage and processing environments could lead to debates about the adequacy of resources and training for compliance.