Texas Senate Bill SB1437

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/6/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/16/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the powers of an associate judge in a Title IV-D case.

Impact

The implementation of SB1437 is expected to simplify the proceedings for child support cases by allowing associate judges to handle additional aspects of these cases without necessitating referral back to the main court. This is likely to reduce the backlog in family law courts and expedite case resolutions, which can benefit families dependent on timely child support arrangements. The changes are especially relevant for Title IV-D cases, which deal with child support enforcement and are vital for ensuring that children receive the financial support they require from non-custodial parents.

Summary

SB1437 addresses the powers of an associate judge in Title IV-D child support cases, specifically amending Section 201.104 of the Family Code. The key purpose of the bill is to expand the scope of matters that an associate judge may hear, thereby streamlining the judicial process in cases involving child support orders. Under the new provisions, an associate judge can not only modify or clarify existing child support orders but also enforce those orders and provide postjudgment relief without a request for a de novo hearing from either party. This adjustment is intended to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of child support case management within the judicial system.

Contention

While there may be some concerns regarding the degree of authority granted to associate judges, the bill is designed to improve legal outcomes by providing a more focused and efficient approach to child support cases. Some stakeholders might worry that this could lead to inconsistent interpretations or applications of the law, but the legislation seeks to ensure that associate judges are given the necessary powers to act decisively in these situations. The bill is largely seen as a procedural improvement rather than a significant alteration to existing family law principles.