Texas Senate Bill SB246

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08

Caption

Relating to limits on political contributions and direct campaign expenditures by individuals, partnerships, partners, and limited liability companies; providing civil and criminal penalties.

Impact

The legislation is anticipated to impact political financing in Texas by curbing the influence of large donations on election outcomes. The establishment of aggregate limits aims to promote fairness and transparency in campaign contributions. Furthermore, the bill introduces civil and criminal penalties for violations of these limits, reinforcing compliance and accountability among candidates and contributors alike. A key aspect of this regulation includes provisions that mandate the return of over-limit contributions to the giver, fostering a more equitable electoral process.

Summary

Senate Bill 246, known as the 'Clean Elections Act', proposes significant amendments to the Texas Election Code by restricting the aggregate limits on political contributions and direct campaign expenditures made by individuals, partnerships, and limited liability companies. Specifically, the bill sets a maximum contribution limit of $100,000 for individuals during an election cycle, which is defined as the period from January 1 of an odd-numbered year to December 31 of the following even-numbered year. An exception is noted for individuals under the age of 18, allowing them to contribute only up to $5,000 in an election cycle.

Contention

There is likely to be contention surrounding SB246, primarily concerning its implications for political freedom and the degree to which the government should regulate campaign financing. Proponents argue that the bill enhances democratic integrity by limiting excessive influence from wealthy individuals and entities. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns that such limits could infringe upon free speech rights, particularly regarding political expression and the ability to support candidates financially. This potential conflict between regulation and freedom of expression is expected to be a focal point of debate as the bill progresses.