Texas Senate Bill SB44

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/9/09
• Voted on by Senate: 3/19/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/30/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the participation of students in funding awarded under the advanced research program.

Impact

The implications of SB44 are significant for higher education in Texas, as it fosters an environment where students can engage directly in research. This can lead to improved educational experiences and better preparedness for future careers in scientific and technical fields. The focus on competitive peer-review processes underpins a commitment to quality research, promoting a culture of excellence in academic institutions. By integrating students into research funding, the bill aims to enhance learning outcomes and provide invaluable experiences that could benefit the Texas workforce.

Summary

Senate Bill 44 (SB44) aims to enhance student participation in funding opportunities provided by the advanced research program in Texas. This legislation specifically amends the Education Code to redefine 'eligible institutions' and emphasize the importance of involving undergraduate and graduate students in basic research projects. The bill delineates that eligible institutions will receive funding to support faculty-led research while mandating that a portion of the funding be allocated towards involving students in these research activities, particularly targeting medical and dental units and other institutions of higher education.

Contention

While SB44 garnered unanimous support during the voting process, it raises important questions regarding the distribution of research funds and the oversight of competitive awards. Critics may voice concerns about the actual implementation of the bill’s provisions, particularly regarding how funds are allocated and whether all eligible institutions will have equal opportunity and support. Furthermore, as research funding can sometimes be limited, there is the potential for competition among institutions to become intense, prompting debates over fairness and accessibility in resource distribution.