Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB705

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
3/23/09  
Voted on by Senate
4/2/09  
Out of House Committee
5/23/09  
Voted on by House
5/27/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/29/09  

Caption

Relating to long-term care consumer information and Medicaid waiver programs.

Impact

The legislation has significant implications for current state laws governing Medicaid waiver programs. Among its key provisions, the bill abolishes the existing consolidated waiver program, thus requiring a transfer of services to other Section 1915(c) waiver programs without interruption. This ensures continuous support for individuals currently benefiting from these programs while aiming to enhance their overall service experience. Additionally, it mandates regular consultation with stakeholders such as consumers, family members, and advocacy groups to uphold transparency and to understand service needs better.

Summary

Senate Bill 705 aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of Medicaid long-term care services in Texas. The bill specifically targets the streamlined administration of Medicaid consolidated waiver programs, which are crucial for individuals requiring long-term care. By introducing measures such as reducing forms, revising training curricula, and consolidating service authorization systems, the bill intends to simplify processes for both providers and consumers. This initiative is framed within the context of improving the delivery of services to individuals with disabilities and the elderly who often depend on these programs for vital assistance.

Contention

While there is general support for improving long-term care services, there is contention regarding the adequacy of transitioning individuals from the abolished consolidated waiver program to other available options. Critics may raise concerns about the practical execution of such transitions, fearing potential gaps in service provision during the changeover. Moreover, the requirement for ongoing stakeholder input might not be enough to mitigate all concerns, particularly among advocates of individuals with disabilities who worry about the loss of specialized programs that may no longer be available post-repeal.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.