Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1080

Filed
 
Introduced
2/2/11  
Out of House Committee
4/21/11  
Voted on by House
5/6/11  
Refer
2/28/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/20/11  
Report Pass
4/13/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/25/11  
Engrossed
5/6/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/9/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/20/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to an exemption for active duty personnel and certain veterans from the requirement to complete the live firing portion of a hunter education program.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1080 could result in increased participation in hunting among military personnel and veterans, as the exemption may alleviate potential barriers related to the traditional hunter education requirements. This change could also foster a positive relationship between the hunting community and military veterans, highlighting respect and acknowledgment of their service. However, it maintains that all other aspects of the hunter education program remain mandatory, ensuring that safety and responsible hunting practices continue to be prioritized.

Summary

House Bill 1080 proposes an amendment to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code that grants an exemption to certain active duty personnel and honorably discharged veterans from completing the live firing portion of the hunter education program. This bill seeks to acknowledge the unique experiences of those in military service and ease their entry into hunting and recreational shooting activities by removing an aspect of the educational requirement that may not be applicable to them. The intent behind the bill is to facilitate access to hunting for veterans and active military members while ensuring safety and compliance with existing regulations.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to have significant opposition, it could spark discussions on the balance between military exemptions and public safety regulations related to hunting. Some advocates for stricter safety measures may raise concerns about the implications of allowing exemptions based on military service. However, proponents argue that veterans and active-duty personnel already have received substantial training and experience that justify such exemptions. Overall, the central point remains whether this bill fairly aligns military service recognition with public safety interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.