Texas House Bill HB1210

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/28/11
• Introduced: 2/9/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Report Pass: 3/22/11

Caption

Relating to the rates charged by certain conservation and reclamation districts for potable water or wastewater service to recreational vehicle parks.

Impact

The legislative aim with HB 1210 is to enhance pricing clarity and fairness for recreational vehicle parks, which often face variable rates that can differ from those applied to conventional commercial businesses. By requiring conservation districts to apply similar pricing methods for RV parks, the bill could potentially lower operational costs for these businesses and contribute to better market conditions for the recreational vehicle industry. However, the bill's alignment with existing economic frameworks regarding water management raises questions regarding the balance of interests between recreational vehicle operations and conservation efforts in the state.

Summary

House Bill 1210 aims to establish specific guidelines for the rates charged by conservation and reclamation districts for potable water or wastewater services provided to recreational vehicle parks. The bill amends Section 49.2122 of the Texas Water Code, introducing a provision that mandates these districts determine rates for nonsubmetered master metered utility service on the same basis as rates determined for other commercial businesses catering to transient customers. This change is positioned to create a more consistent pricing structure for RV parks utilizing water and wastewater services from local districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1210 include concerns regarding the long-term implications of uniform rate structuring on conservation efforts and the financial sustainability of conservation districts. Critics argue that by predominantly focusing on the economic benefits to RV parks, the bill may inadvertently undermine the fiscal health of these districts, which are tasked with managing water resources sustainably. The discussion reflects broader debates in Texas about balancing economic development with responsible environmental stewardship.