Texas House Bill HB1251

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/10/11
• Out of House Committee: 3/21/11
• Voted on by House: 3/30/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 3/16/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/11/11
• Engrossed: 3/30/11
• Governor Action: 5/27/11
• Refer: 4/13/11
• Report Pass: 5/9/11
• Enrolled: 5/12/11
• Passed: 5/27/11

Caption

Relating to the election of the members of the Board of Port Commissioners of the Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County.

Impact

This bill impacts the governance structure of the Port of Port Arthur Navigation District by establishing a clearer framework for elections and terms of service for commissioners. By synchronizing the election date with other elections, it aims to enhance voter participation and civic engagement in the port district. The extended terms of office for commissioners could lead to improved oversight and strategic planning, benefitting long-term initiatives and investments in port operations.

Summary

House Bill 1251 mandates the process for electing members to the Board of Port Commissioners for the Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County. The key amendments include stipulations for holding elections on a uniform date in May during odd-numbered years, thereby aligning the election cycle with other local and state elections. Furthermore, the bill modifies the terms of the port commissioners, extending them from four years to six years, ensuring stability within the Board's membership and potentially increasing the effectiveness of their governance over longer terms.

Contention

Notable concerns surrounding HB 1251 include debated implications of term length on accountability and responsiveness of port commissioners. While supporters argue that longer terms could foster seasoned leadership and continuity, opponents assert that it might reduce accountability to the electorate. Additionally, discussions touch upon whether the proposed election timing adequately reflects the unique needs and preferences of the local community and whether it could lead to diminished voter engagement if perceived as overly bureaucratic.