Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1314

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/20/11  
Introduced
2/14/11  
Voted on by House
5/4/11  
Refer
3/1/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/11  
Report Pass
4/14/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/25/11  
Engrossed
5/4/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/5/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/21/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  

Caption

Relating to the operation and jurisdiction of certain district courts serving Webb County.

Notes

Furthermore, the bill incorporates provisions regarding the selection of jury commissioners and the impaneling of grand juries, emphasizing the significant role of the 341st District Court. This introduces a layer of flexibility and collaboration among the district court judges that could address various case types effectively.

Impact

The proposed changes are expected to enhance the operational efficiency of the district courts by providing a more organized structure for case management. The bill gives the clerk of district courts the authority to assign and docket cases at random, unless specific legal preferences regarding case types take precedence. By doing so, HB1314 aims to streamline judicial procedures, which might lead to a reduction in case backlog and promote timely resolutions in civil and criminal matters.

Summary

House Bill 1314 aims to clarify and amend the operation and jurisdiction of certain district courts serving Webb County. This legislation introduces a systematic approach for filing civil cases, criminal cases, and tax suits within the district courts in Webb County. It mandates that all civil cases are to be filed on a singular civil file docket, while criminal cases and tax suits are maintained in separate dockets, ensuring clarity and organization in the judicial process.

Contention

While the bill primarily focuses on administrative aspects of court operations, there are notable points of contention relating to jurisdiction among existing district courts. The amendment of concurrent jurisdiction statutes may create disputes over authority, particularly in cases like family violence and other sensitive issues. Critics may argue that restructuring the jurisdictional framework could lead to confusion and potential overlap in case handling, thus impacting legal proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.