Texas House Bill HB1625

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/22/11
• Out of House Committee: 3/28/11
• Voted on by House: 4/14/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 3/22/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/6/11
• Engrossed: 4/14/11
• Governor Action: 5/19/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Enrolled: 5/7/11
• Passed: 5/19/11

Caption

Relating to the renewal of electrical sign apprentice licenses.

Impact

The implementation of this law will apply to all license renewals that occur after September 1, 2012. For licenses expiring prior to this date, the existing legal framework will persist. This change ensures that all electrical sign apprentice license holders will maintain a baseline of current knowledge pertinent to safety and compliance with evolving regulations. The requirement for continuing education is seen as a proactive measure to encourage professional development and adaptability in a field defined by ongoing technological advancements and regulatory changes.

Summary

House Bill 1625 pertains specifically to the renewal process of electrical sign apprentice licenses. The legislation mandates that individuals wishing to renew their licenses, who are not enrolled in an apprenticeship training program, must complete four hours of continuing education annually. This continuing education should focus on critical areas such as safety, the National Electrical Code, and relevant state laws and rules governing license holders in this field. By introducing educational requirements, the bill aims to enhance the professionals' knowledge and adherence to updated standards in electrical safety and regulations.

Contention

Notably, discussions around HB1625 may revolve around the balance of regulatory requirements versus the capacity of practitioners to fulfill these new educational mandates. While many stakeholders support the necessity of continuing education to uphold safety standards and professional competence, concerns could arise regarding access to such educational resources and the potential financial burden on license holders. The bill may also ignite debate on the role of state regulation in governing professional practices and the extent to which the state can impose such requirements without overstepping into the domain of local licensing practices.