Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1678

Filed
 
Introduced
2/23/11  
Out of House Committee
4/20/11  
Voted on by House
5/6/11  
Refer
3/3/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/13/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/19/11  
Engrossed
5/6/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/9/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/13/11  
Enrolled
5/21/11  
Enrolled
5/21/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the employment of an elections administrator.

Impact

One of the significant impacts of HB 1678 is its alignment with the provisions of the Government Code, particularly Chapter 551, which pertains to open meetings. With the bill, both the county and joint elections commissions must now adhere to open meeting standards, including providing personal written notice of any meetings to the elections administrator. This change is anticipated to promote transparency within election-related processes and ensure that elections administrators are kept informed regarding the commission's activities that directly affect their roles.

Summary

House Bill 1678 aims to clarify the employment procedures and authority related to elections administrators within Texas counties. The bill stipulates that the powers of a county election commission or a joint elections commission are limited to the appointment, acceptance of resignation, and recommendation for the termination of the county or joint elections administrator. By restricting the powers of these commissions, the bill seeks to establish clear guidelines governing the employment of elections officials, thereby enhancing the accountability and effectiveness of election administration at the county level.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to have generated major contention, discussions around the employment of elections administrators often touch upon broader concerns regarding election integrity and public confidence in electoral processes. Increased transparency through open meeting requirements could be a double-edged sword, as while it holds commissions accountable, it could also lead to increased scrutiny and politicization of elections administration. Stakeholders might argue about the balance between necessary oversight and the operational autonomy needed for effective election management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.