Texas House Bill HB1752

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Refer: 2/24/11

Caption

Relating to the appointment of a conservator for and authorizing the dissolution of the Bexar Metropolitan Water District.

Impact

The passage of HB 1752 will mark a significant change in how water services are managed within the Bexar Metropolitan Water District's service area. By potentially dissolving the District, the bill aims to integrate its assets and responsibilities into a larger system, which is expected to enhance reliability and efficiency in water service delivery. The act would trigger a series of evaluations and transitional measures to ensure continuous service provision to residents, while also safeguarding employee interests through specific conditions regarding employment and termination.

Summary

House Bill 1752 addresses the future of the Bexar Metropolitan Water District by establishing procedures for the appointment of a conservator and initiating the process for its potential dissolution. The bill aims to ensure that the water services previously provided by the District are effectively managed and that the relevant operations are taken over by a municipal water utility that meets the population threshold and services needed for the community. A conservator, appointed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, will oversee the transition and necessary operational adjustments during this process.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1752 appears to be mixed, reflecting both the necessity for oversight in the wake of past operational difficulties at the District and concerns over the implications of dissolving a local governance body. Proponents argue that the measures outlined in the bill foster improved management and service reliability, while critics may voice apprehension about reduced local control and potential job losses among District employees. Overall, the bill is perceived as a necessary step towards reforming the water utility management in the region.

Contention

Debate surrounding HB 1752 likely centers on the balance between effective oversight for the management of water resources and the maintenance of local governance structures. While the bill's intent to appoint an expert conservator and potentially dissolve the District speaks to addressing inefficiencies, it raises questions about the long-term implications for local representation and accountability. Moreover, the requirement for a vote on the dissolution amplifies the need for transparency and public engagement in the decision-making process.