Texas House Bill HB2404

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Refer: 3/10/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Report Pass: 4/21/11

Impact

The introduction of HB2404 represents a significant change in how state-owned housing is managed and the financial responsibilities of employees who utilize these facilities. It mandates that state agencies require employees to contribute a monthly fee to the local school district if the full market rental value is not being recouped. This could lead to increased housing costs for certain state employees, and thus has financial implications for state budgets and local educational funding.

Summary

House Bill 2404 aims to impose a privilege fee on state employees who occupy state-owned housing provided by state agencies. The bill establishes that by September 1 each year, the land office must determine the fair market rental value of such housing and notify the relevant state agencies. If an agency does not recover 100% of the fair market rental value from the employee, the employee must remit a monthly privilege fee to the local school district. This fee will be calculated as 20% of the difference between the fair market rental value and the amount paid by the employee, if any.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2404 appears to be mixed, with some legislators viewing it as a necessary measure to ensure that state-owned housing aligns with market values and contributes to local schools. Conversely, there may be opposition from state employees who could face increased costs, highlighting concerns regarding affordability and equity for those in state service.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fairness and potential impact of imposing additional fees on state employees, which could disproportionately affect lower-wage workers. Legislators and advocacy groups may argue against these fees, suggesting that they may hinder the state's ability to attract and retain employees, especially in areas where state housing is already limited or costly. Additionally, concerns regarding the administrative burden placed on agencies to calculate and collect these fees may arise.