Texas House Bill HB2418

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/30/11
• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Voted on by House: 4/8/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/11/11
• Report Pass: 3/24/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/8/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/11/11
• Enrolled: 5/23/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the territory, board of directors, and powers of the North Harris County Regional Water Authority.

Impact

By redefining the boundaries of the authority and modifying its powers, HB2418 impacts state laws concerning groundwater management and local water governance. It streamlines the annexation process, specifying that newly annexed territories will automatically fall under the authority's jurisdiction unless they have existing agreements for groundwater reduction plans with other local governments. This change could significantly affect how residents and municipalities interact with the authority, particularly surrounding issues of water management and regulatory oversight.

Summary

House Bill 2418 relates to the governance and operational framework of the North Harris County Regional Water Authority. The bill amends various sections of existing legislation regarding the authority's territory and its board of directors. It specifically addresses territorial changes by allowing for the inclusion of additional municipal utility districts and regulating how local governments may control groundwater reduction plans. This structural adjustment aims primarily to enhance the authority's capacity to manage water resources effectively in the face of regional demands and integration of additional territories.

Contention

Notable points of contention raised during discussions included the perceived overreach of the authority into local governance and concerns about the waiver of governmental immunity for certain actions taken against political subdivisions. Some stakeholders expressed apprehension that the bill could lead to conflicts between local regulatory frameworks and the authority's overarching management strategies. Critics argued that such changes might diminish local control over water resources, highlighting a broader debate about the balance between centralized authority and local governance in environmental management.