Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2482

Filed
 
Introduced
3/8/11  
Out of House Committee
4/18/11  
Voted on by House
4/27/11  
Refer
3/14/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/12/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/19/11  
Engrossed
4/27/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
4/28/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/12/11  
Enrolled
5/21/11  
Enrolled
5/21/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the prosecution of and punishment for certain offenses involving theft.

Impact

The impact of HB2482 on state laws includes an increase in the penalties for specific categories of theft-related offenses. For example, the bill stipulates that certain actions, such as causing alarms to sound or using tools to disable theft detectors, will elevate the severity of the criminal charges. It adjusts the classification of offenses based on the value of stolen merchandise, creating a tiered consequence system that takes into consideration the circumstances surrounding each offense. This change is poised to empower law enforcement and judicial entities to tackle theft more precisely, generating a deterrent effect for potential offenders.

Summary

House Bill 2482 focuses on the prosecution and punishment of offenses related to theft, specifically targeting retail theft. The bill introduces key definitions, enhancing the existing laws to address modern methods of shoplifting, including the use of devices designed to avoid detection by retail theft detectors. It defines terms such as 'retail merchandise', 'retail theft detector', and 'shielding or deactivation instrument', thus clarifying the types of offenses and tools involved in these crimes. The amendments also reflect an effort to stay current with evolving retail environments and criminal strategies, aiming to enable law enforcement to more effectively prosecute those who engage in theft-related activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB2482 include concerns from civil liberties advocates regarding the broad definitions of terms which could potentially lead to overreach in enforcement. Critics argue that the expansion of the penal code could inadvertently target individuals or groups for minor infractions that don’t necessarily warrant severe penalties. Additionally, there may be concerns about the implications for retail establishments, especially regarding the balance between effective loss prevention strategies and customer privacy. Proponents, however, argue that these measures are necessary to adequately protect retailers and their assets against increasingly sophisticated theft methods.

Companion Bills

TX SB388

Identical Relating to the offense of organized retail theft.

Similar Bills

CA AB1760

Bulk merchandise pallets.

MS SB2215

Shoplifting; provide enhancement where merchant is in the business of selling food or drugstore items.

CA AB2745

State parks: merchandise sales.

AL SB206

Relating to crimes and offenses; to create the Retail Theft Crime Prevention Act; to provide for the crime of retail theft in various degrees; to provide for the crime of organized retail theft; to provide criminal penalties for a violation

CA SB982

Crimes: organized theft.

AL HB288

Relating to crimes and offenses; to create the Retail Theft Crime Prevention Act; to provide for the crime of retail theft in various degrees; to provide for the crime of organized retail theft; to provide criminal penalties for a violation;

CA SB162

Cannabis: marketing.

CA AB523

Organized retail theft: cargo.