Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2649

Filed
 
Introduced
3/9/11  
Out of House Committee
4/29/11  
Voted on by House
5/12/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/11  
Report Pass
4/26/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/24/11  
Engrossed
5/12/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/13/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/21/11  
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Enrolled
5/25/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the award of diligent participation credit to defendants confined in a state jail felony facility.

Impact

The implementation of HB2649 could significantly alter the landscape of incarceration in Texas by promoting rehabilitation over punishment. By allowing for the credit system, the bill provides an incentive for inmates to engage in activities that can help them reintegrate into society post-release. Furthermore, this approach acknowledges the value of education and vocational training, potentially reducing recidivism rates and fostering a better-qualified workforce among former offenders.

Summary

House Bill 2649 aims to establish a system of diligent participation credits for defendants confined in state jail felony facilities in Texas. The bill modifies existing laws to allow for credits to be granted based on participation in educational, vocational, and treatment programs while incarcerated. This initiative is seen as a way to encourage personal development and rehabilitation among inmates, providing them with opportunities to earn time off their sentences through active involvement in constructive programs. Specifically, the bill stipulates that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice must report participation to the sentencing court within a designated timeframe.

Contention

However, the bill may encounter opposition from those who believe that it could undermine penalties associated with state jail felonies. Critics may argue that providing early release credits could diminish the perceived severity of certain offenses, thus detracting from the deterrent effect of the criminal justice system. Additionally, concerns about implementation and the potential for inconsistencies in awarding credits might arise, particularly regarding how 'diligent participation' is defined and measured. As a result, careful oversight will be essential to ensure the bill's objectives are met without compromising the integrity of the justice system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.