Texas House Bill HB2703

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/29/11
• Voted on by House: 5/6/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/18/11
• Report Pass: 4/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 5/6/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the regulation of orthotists and prosthetists.

Impact

The passage of HB2703 is poised to impact state laws governing healthcare professions by clarifying the licensing process for orthotists and prosthetists. By outlining specific exemptions for individuals engaged in manufacturing devices for patients under physician orders, the bill aims to reduce regulatory burdens while ensuring patient safety. Thereby, it creates a pathway for practitioners to work efficiently within their scope while interacting seamlessly with other medical professionals and adhering to state health regulations.

Summary

House Bill 2703 seeks to amend the Occupations Code in Texas concerning the practice and regulation of orthotists and prosthetists. The bill provides clearer definitions regarding the scope of practice for these professions and specifies the conditions under which individuals can operate as licensed professionals. Notably, it addresses the requirement for a licensed practitioner's order for the fabrication or service of orthoses and prostheses, emphasizing the need for collaboration within the healthcare framework when serving patients with neuromuscular or musculoskeletal issues.

Contention

Although the bill generally enjoys support from the healthcare community, concerns may arise regarding the implications for device manufacturers operating independently from licensed practitioners. The necessity of orders for specific patients as stated in the bill might pose challenges for manufacturers who provide broader solutions. Additionally, there could be debates surrounding the amendment of regulations affecting the ease of accessibility for entrepreneurs wishing to venture into the healthcare device industry, hence sparking discussions about the balance between regulation and market freedom.