Texas House Bill HB271

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to a study on effective methods for high school dropout prevention.

Impact

The studied practices will focus on creating a more coordinated program involving various educational levels—from elementary to junior high—ensuring a seamless transition for students into high schools that struggle with dropout issues. This approach seeks to identify and leverage local resources through state matching grants to enhance dropout prevention initiatives. As part of the study, the bill outlines the importance of collaboration among parents, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local governments, thus emphasizing a community-centric approach to tackling the dropout crisis.

Summary

House Bill 271 is aimed at addressing the critical issue of high school dropout rates in Texas by mandating a comprehensive study on effective prevention methods. The bill directs the commissioner of education to contract with educational research centers to explore best practices in dropout prevention. Key elements of the study include examining local causes of students dropping out and evaluating early intervention strategies that can be implemented within schools, specifically targeting high schools with prevalent dropout issues.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 271 appears to be generally favorable among educators and local advocates who support proactive measures to reduce dropout rates. There is a recognition that collaborative and funded initiatives are crucial in helping at-risk students stay in school. However, some concerns have been raised about the adequacy of funding and whether the strategies proposed will address the diverse challenges faced by different communities throughout Texas.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding the bill is the reliance on state funding to support the proposed studies and initiatives. Some critics argue that without guaranteed funding and comprehensive resources, the study's recommendations may not translate into effective action on the ground. Moreover, ensuring that strategies are adaptable to various local contexts remains a critical concern. The bill's limited time frame for reporting study findings also raises questions about the feasibility of implementing effective interventions based on potentially lagging results.