Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3385

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the exchange of confidential information among certain governmental entities concerning certain juveniles.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3385 will have significant implications for state laws governing the confidentiality of juvenile information. By facilitating information exchange, the bill is expected to streamline processes for identifying and supporting multi-system youth, ultimately leading to better outcomes for this vulnerable group. However, it also mandates that local educational institutions and juvenile service providers comply with these information-sharing requests, which may change how they manage student records and their interactions with other agencies.

Summary

House Bill 3385 seeks to enhance the exchange of confidential information among certain governmental entities regarding juveniles, particularly those categorized as multi-system youth. This bill modifies existing provisions in the Education Code and Family Code by establishing clearer protocols for the sharing of educational records and personal health information among juvenile service providers. The legislation aims to improve the coordination and quality of care provided to youth involved in multiple system services, including education and juvenile justice.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 3385 appears to be one of cautious support, particularly among stakeholders in juvenile justice and educational services. Advocates argue that the ability to share important information will lead to more efficient and effective service delivery for troubled youth. Concerns primarily arise from apprehensions about maintaining the confidentiality of sensitive information and the potential impacts on privacy rights of juveniles and their families.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the balance between necessary information sharing and the protection of individual privacy rights. While the bill does include safeguards regarding the release of information, such as limiting disclosures to cases directed by court orders or laws, there are worries about how these measures will be enforced in practice. Some critics may also question the effectiveness of the bill in achieving its intended goals, particularly if adequate training and resources are not provided to those involved in implementing the new protocols.

Companion Bills

TX SB1106

Identical Relating to the exchange of confidential information concerning certain juveniles.

Similar Bills

CA SB1064

Prisons: confidential informants.

CT HB05346

An Act Concerning State Agency Confidentiality Based On A Program Review And Investigations Committee Study.

CA AB925

Protective orders: confidential information regarding minors.

CA AB2492

Public postsecondary education: sex discrimination complaints: advocates and coordinators.

CA AB3043

Corrections: confidential calls.

CA AB919

Confidentiality of voter information: cognitively impaired individuals.

IA HSB188

A bill for an act relating to the examination of confidential records by the general assembly.

CA SB357

Vehicles: physician and surgeon reporting.