Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB471

Filed
12/22/10  
Out of House Committee
5/11/11  
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to election through secret ballot of a labor union as the exclusive bargaining representative.

Impact

The enactment of HB 471 will directly amend the Texas Labor Code by adding a new section focusing on the election process for labor unions. This change could enhance employee trust in the collective bargaining process and may lead to increased participation in union elections. By stipulating that representatives are chosen via secret ballot, the bill aims to reduce the potential for employer influence during union elections and protect employees’ rights to freely choose their representatives.

Summary

House Bill 471 aims to establish a method for labor unions to be elected as exclusive bargaining representatives through a secret ballot process. Specifically, the bill mandates that any labor union seeking to represent employees in a collective bargaining unit must be elected by a majority vote of employees present and participating in the election, thus ensuring transparency and confidentiality in the voting procedure. This approach is intended to bolster the democratic legitimacy of unions, allowing employees to express their preferences without fear of coercion.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 471 reflects a significant legislative effort to clarify and enhance the election process for labor unions within Texas. By introducing a framework for secret ballots in union elections, it seeks to ensure that employee voices are adequately represented in their choice of labor representation. As the bill is set to take effect on September 1, 2011, it may reshape the landscape of labor relations in Texas, with potential implications for both workers and employers in navigating collective bargaining.

Contention

While proponents argue that the bill strengthens democratic principles within labor relations, critics might view this as an attempt to limit the practices surrounding union representation. Some may raise concerns that the bill could complicate or slow down the process of union formation and may also inadvertently empower anti-union sentiment in workplaces by emphasizing formal voting procedures over existing informal processes. Moreover, the bill explicitly states that it does not affect collective bargaining agreements entered into before its effective date, indicating an attempt to balance new regulations without disrupting existing labor relations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.