Proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation and funding of the state water implementation fund for Texas to assist the Texas Water Development Board in the funding of certain projects included in the state water plan.
The HJR138 resolution outlines that funds deposited may come from fees or taxes specifically levied for this purpose, with the revenue administered without further appropriation by the Texas Water Development Board. This means that the board will have autonomy over the distribution of these funds to various water-related projects, thereby potentially expediting the process of funding crucial infrastructure developments necessary for ensuring sustainable water supply throughout the state.
HJR138, also known as the Joint Resolution proposing a constitutional amendment, aims to create and fund the state water implementation fund in Texas. This fund is designed to assist the Texas Water Development Board in financing projects that are included in the state's water plan. The creation of this fund is a response to the ongoing challenges related to water management and infrastructure in Texas, ensuring a dedicated pool of resources for critical water projects.
During discussions, there were points of contention regarding the imposition of a public water supply service connection fee. The proposal states that this fee would be collected from utility customers, with set limits on the amount charged based on the type of service (residential, commercial, industrial). Some stakeholders raised concerns that this could place additional financial burdens on consumers, especially in low-income communities, leading to debates over the fairness of such fees.
The resolution specifies temporary provisions and lays down the general laws under which these funds will be managed, with a review period that extends up to September 1, 2027, for certain aspects. It is crucial to note that the ballot for this proposed amendment is set for an election, allowing the voters of Texas to have a direct say in its implementation. Proponents believe this funding mechanism will streamline efforts to improve water infrastructure, while opponents worry about the implications of the associated fees.