Texas Senate Bill SB1521

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/6/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/11
• Refer: 3/22/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/20/11
• Report Pass: 4/6/11
• Voted on by House: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 4/21/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/18/11
• Enrolled: 5/23/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the distribution of money appropriated from a municipal court building security fund.

Note

To implement the changes proposed in SB1521, the bill requires a two-thirds vote from both houses for immediate effect. Otherwise, it would take effect on September 1, 2011. This stipulation implies urgency in the legislative process concerning public safety.

Impact

This legislation could significantly impact how municipal courts operate by allowing them to procure improved security measures with state-provided funds. The expanded definitions and permitted uses of the security fund will enable courts to adapt to contemporary security concerns effectively. By investing in both physical security equipment and training, courts can create a safer environment for judges, staff, and the public, which has become increasingly important in light of rising security threats in public spaces.

Summary

SB1521 proposes amendments to Section 102.017 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically concerning the utilization of funds from a municipal court building security fund. The bill expands the definition of 'security personnel, services, and items' to include a variety of equipment and services aimed at enhancing security in court facilities. Such items would encompass X-ray machines, handheld and walkthrough metal detectors, electronic locking and surveillance systems, and security training for personnel. The goal is to bolster the safety infrastructure within municipal courts across Texas.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB1521 could arise from fiscal concerns regarding the allocation of state funds to local courts. Questions may be raised about the adequacy and efficient use of such funds, as courts could vary widely in their needs for security investments. Further scrutiny may involve whether the allocation procedures are standardized and transparent, ensuring equitable access to resources among different municipalities. Stakeholders may debate the potential need for additional oversight or guidelines on how these funds should be spent to prevent misuse or misallocation.