Texas Senate Bill SB202

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 11/10/10
• Refer: 1/31/11
• Report Pass: 4/4/11
• Engrossed: 4/12/11
• Refer: 4/28/11

Impact

The implementation of SB202 is expected to create a more structured approach to assessing the efficiency of state expenditures. By requiring regular evaluations and reports, the bill aims to ensure that state funds are utilized effectively in relation to the stated goals of legislation. This could lead to wiser financial decisions and adjustments to funding in instances where legislative outcomes do not align with expectations. Therefore, SB202 could potentially reshape the landscape of fiscal responsibility within Texas state government.

Summary

SB202 aims to enhance transparency and accountability in state legislative processes by mandating that any fiscal note attached to a bill includes a clear purpose statement and measurable benchmarks. This initiative is designed to allow legislators to evaluate the effectiveness of bills in achieving their intended outcomes. The Legislative Budget Board (LBB) is charged with coordinating with bill authors to define these purposes and benchmarks when preparing the fiscal notes. The bill stipulates that, within a specific timeframe after a bill is enacted, the LBB shall report on whether these benchmarks have been met.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB202 appears to favor increased accountability in the legislative process. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate a more informed decision-making process for legislators and the public by fostering a clear understanding of how state funds are used and whether the goals set out in legislation are achieved. Critics, however, may express concerns regarding the feasibility of establishing realistic benchmarks and may worry about the added bureaucracy in legislative evaluations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential disagreements on what constitutes reasonable benchmarks and how the success or failure of various programs is measured. Furthermore, the reality of the LBB's workload and the complexities of evaluating different legislative initiatives could lead to pushback from legislators who feel that the extra oversight might complicate the lawmaking process. This will necessitate ongoing discussions about the balance between accountability and legislative efficiency.