Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB296

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the mitigation of the impact of residential development in public school districts.

Impact

The enactment of SB296 will likely alter how residential development interacts with public school funding and planning. School districts gain the right to acquire land for new facilities, which could mitigate future overcrowding in schools, particularly in rapidly growing areas. By mandating developer notification, the bill promotes collaboration between municipalities and school districts, enabling proactive planning rather than reactive measures once problems arise.

Summary

SB296 aims to address the impact of residential development on public school districts in Texas. The bill stipulates that developers of residential projects containing 1,000 or more units must notify the local school district before submitting plans for approval. The intent is to enable school districts to assess the potential rise in student enrollment and the corresponding need for new facilities. If such growth is anticipated, school districts can purchase land within the development site for new elementary schools, ensuring they can accommodate increased enrollment effectively.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB296 appears to be supportive, particularly among educators and school administrators who see it as a necessary tool for managing growth and ensuring adequate resources for students. However, some developers may view the bill as an additional regulatory burden that could complicate the development process. Overall, there seems to be a shared recognition that without proper planning and coordination, new residential developments can strain existing public services, especially education.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the specifics of land acquisition and the fair market value determination for land purchased by school districts. Developers might argue the bill could lead to increased costs and slow down development timelines. There could also be debates over how much land should be made available and whether the criteria for determining necessary school facilities are appropriately stringent. Thus, while the bill presents an important step towards addressing educational needs in growing communities, discussions around its implementation and impact on local development practices will likely continue.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL HB5430

SCH CD-RESIDENT DISTRICT

CA AB2488

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

CA AB306

School districts and community college districts: employee housing.

CA AB1445

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts.

CA SB998

Discontinuation of residential water service: urban and community water systems.

CA AB460

Fire protection: residential fire sprinklers: fees.

MN HF3156

Local government regulations of certain residential developments by religious organizations restricted, civil remedies provided, and money appropriated.

MN SF3199

Yes in God's Backyard (YIGBY) Housing Act establishment