Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB656 Latest Draft

Bill / Senate Committee Report Version Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            By: Huffman, Hegar S.B. No. 656
 (In the Senate - Filed March 8, 2011; March 16, 2011, read
 first time and referred to Committee on Government Organization;
 March 31, 2011, reported adversely, with favorable Committee
 Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 6, Nays 0; March 31, 2011,
 sent to printer.)
 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 656 By:  Hegar


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the abolition of the Coastal Coordination Council and
 the transfer of its functions to the General Land Office.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subsection (g), Section 201.026, Agriculture
 Code, is amended to read as follows:
 (g)  In an area that the state board identifies as having or
 having the potential to develop agricultural or silvicultural
 nonpoint source water quality problems or an area within the
 "coastal zone" designated by the commissioner of the General Land
 Office [Coastal Coordination Council], the state board shall
 establish a water quality management plan certification program
 that provides, through local soil and water conservation districts,
 for the development, supervision, and monitoring of individual
 water quality management plans for agricultural and silvicultural
 lands.  Each plan must be developed, maintained, and implemented
 under rules and criteria adopted by the state board and comply with
 state water quality standards established by the Texas Commission
 on Environmental Quality.  The state board shall certify a plan that
 satisfies the state board's rules and criteria and complies with
 state water quality standards established by the Texas Commission
 on Environmental Quality under the commission's exclusive
 authority to set water quality standards for all water in the state.
 SECTION 2.  Section 33.004, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended by adding Subdivision (2-a) to read as follows:
 (2-a)  "Committee" means the Coastal Coordination
 Advisory Committee.
 SECTION 3.  Section 33.051, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.051.  GENERAL DUTY. The board, the commissioner
 [council], the land office, and the network shall perform the
 duties provided in this subchapter.
 SECTION 4.  Subsection (a), Section 33.052, Natural
 Resources Code, is amended to read as follows:
 (a)  The commissioner shall develop a continuing
 comprehensive coastal management program pursuant to the policies
 stated in Section 33.202 [of this code. The program is not
 effective until approved by a majority of the council under Section
 33.204 of this code].
 SECTION 5.  Subsection (b), Section 33.052, Natural
 Resources Code, as amended by Chapters 165 (S.B. 971) and 416 (H.B.
 3226), Acts of the 74th Legislature, Regular Session, 1995, is
 reenacted and amended to read as follows:
 (b)  In developing the program, the land office shall act as
 the lead agency to coordinate and implement a comprehensive coastal
 management program [develop a long-term plan] for the management of
 uses affecting coastal natural resource areas, in cooperation with
 other state agencies that have duties relating to coastal matters[,
 including those agencies represented on the council]. The program
 shall implement the policies stated in Section 33.202 [of this
 code] and shall include the elements listed in Section 33.053 [of
 this code].
 SECTION 6.  Subsection (e), Section 33.052, Natural
 Resources Code, is amended to read as follows:
 (e)  This section does not add to or subtract from the duties
 and responsibilities of a state agency other than the land office,
 the commissioner [council], and the board.
 SECTION 7.  Section 33.055, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.055.  PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER COASTAL MANAGEMENT
 PROGRAM. In developing, reviewing, or amending the coastal
 management program, after due notice to affected persons and the
 public generally, the commissioner [and the council] shall hold or
 have held public hearings as the commissioner determines [and the
 council determine] to be appropriate.
 SECTION 8.  Subsections (a), (e), (f), and (g), Section
 33.204, Natural Resources Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a)  The commissioner [council] by rule shall adopt goals and
 policies of the coastal management program. A goal or policy may
 not require an agency or subdivision to perform an action that would
 exceed the constitutional or statutory authority of the agency or
 subdivision to which the goal or policy applies.
 (e)  In conducting consistency reviews under Section 33.205
 [of this code], the commissioner [council] shall receive and
 consider the oral or written testimony of any person regarding the
 coastal management program as the testimony relates to the agency
 or subdivision action or federal agency action or activity or outer
 continental shelf plan under review.  The commissioner [council]
 may reasonably limit the length and format of the testimony and the
 time at which it will be received. Notice of the period during
 which the testimony will be received shall be published in the Texas
 Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in each county
 directly affected by the matter under review before the
 commencement of that period. The commissioner [council] shall
 consider only the record before the agency or subdivision involved
 in the matter under review, the agency's or subdivision's findings,
 applicable laws and rules, any additional information provided by
 that agency or subdivision, and public testimony under this
 subsection, provided that if the agency or subdivision did not hold
 a hearing, make a record, or make findings, the commissioner
 [council] may hold a hearing and make findings necessary to a
 complete and thorough review.
 (f)  [The land office shall assist the council in carrying
 out its duties. The council members may not receive compensation
 for services but may receive reimbursement for actual and necessary
 expenses.] The land office, in coordination with other agencies
 and subdivisions, shall prepare an annual report on the
 effectiveness of the coastal management program. [The land office
 shall submit the report to the council for approval.] On or before
 January 15 of each odd-numbered year, the land office shall send to
 the legislature each of the previous two annual reports.
 (g)  The commissioner [council] may award grants to projects
 that further the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program [council]. The commissioner [council] shall establish the
 procedures for making any determination related to awarding a
 grant.
 SECTION 9.  Section 33.2041, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.2041.  COASTAL COORDINATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
 [COMPOSITION OF COUNCIL; TERMS]. (a)  The commissioner by rule
 shall establish the Coastal Coordination Advisory Committee to
 advise the commissioner on matters related to the coastal
 management program. The committee [council] shall consist of:
 (1)  a representative of each of the following entities
 designated by the presiding officer of that entity [ex officio
 members]:
 (A)  the land office [commissioner];
 (B)  the [presiding officer of the] Parks and
 Wildlife Department [Commission or a member of the commission
 designated by the presiding officer];
 (C)  the [presiding officer of the] Texas
 Commission on Environmental Quality [Natural Resource Conservation
 Commission or a member of the commission designated by the
 presiding officer];
 (D)  [a member of] the Railroad Commission of
 Texas [appointed by that commission];
 (E)  the [presiding officer of the] Texas Water
 Development Board [or a member of the board designated by the
 presiding officer];
 (F)  the [presiding officer of the] Texas
 Department of Transportation [Commission or a member of the
 commission designated by the presiding officer];
 (G)  [a member of] the State Soil and Water
 Conservation Board [appointed by that board]; and
 (H)  the [director of the] Texas [A&M University]
 Sea Grant College Program to serve as a nonvoting member; and
 (2)  the following members to be appointed by the
 commissioner [governor with the advice and consent of the senate to
 serve a two-year term]:
 (A)  a city or county elected official who resides
 in the coastal area;
 (B)  an owner of a business located in the coastal
 area who resides in the coastal area;
 (C)  a resident from the coastal area; and
 (D)  a representative of agriculture.
 (b)  The commissioner by rule shall establish the terms of
 office for and duties of committee members [terms of the positions
 on the council held by the city or county elected official who
 resides in the coastal area and the resident from the coastal area
 expire May 31 of each even-numbered year. The terms of the
 positions on the council held by the owner of a business located in
 the coastal area who resides in the coastal area and the
 representative of agriculture expire May 31 of each odd-numbered
 year].
 (c)  Chapter 2110, Government Code, does not apply to the
 size, composition, or duration of the committee [Appointments to
 the council shall be made without regard to the race, color,
 disability, sex, religion, age, or national origin of the
 appointees].
 SECTION 10.  The heading to Section 33.205, Natural
 Resources Code, is amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.205.  CONSISTENCY WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM;
 COMMISSIONER [COUNCIL] REVIEW.
 SECTION 11.  Section 33.205, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended by amending Subsections (b) through (h) and adding
 Subsections (f-1) and (f-2) to read as follows:
 (b)  An agency or subdivision subject to the requirements of
 Subsection (a) shall affirm that it has taken into account the goals
 and policies of the coastal management program by issuing a written
 determination that a proposed agency or subdivision action
 described by Section 33.2051 or 33.2053 is consistent with the
 program goals and policies.
 (c)  The commissioner [council] may [not] review a proposed
 agency or subdivision action subject to the requirements of
 Subsections (a) and (b) [of this section] for consistency with the
 goals and policies of the coastal management program if [unless]:
 (1)  the consistency determination for the proposed
 action was contested by:
 (A)  a member of the committee [council member] or
 an agency that was a party in a formal hearing under Chapter 2001,
 Government Code, or in an alternative dispute resolution process;
 or
 (B)  another [a council member or other] person by
 the filing of written comments with the agency before the action was
 proposed if the proposed action is one for which a formal hearing
 under Chapter 2001, Government Code, is not available; and
 (2)  a person described by Subdivision (1) [of this
 subsection] files a request for referral alleging a significant
 unresolved dispute regarding the proposed action's consistency
 with the goals and policies of the coastal management program[; and
 [(3)     any three members of the council other than the
 director of the Texas A&M University Sea Grant Program agree that
 there is a significant unresolved dispute regarding the proposed
 action's consistency with the goals and policies of the coastal
 management program and the matter is placed on the agenda for a
 council meeting].
 (d)  If consistency review thresholds are in effect under
 Section 33.2052, the commissioner [council] may not review a
 proposed action subject to the requirements of Subsections (a) and
 (b) for consistency with the goals and policies of the coastal
 management program unless the requirements of Subsection (c) are
 satisfied and:
 (1)  if the proposed action is one for which a formal
 hearing under Chapter 2001, Government Code, is available:
 (A)  the action exceeds the applicable thresholds
 and the agency's consistency determination was contested in a
 formal hearing or in an alternative dispute resolution process; or
 (B)  the action does not exceed the applicable
 thresholds but may directly and adversely affect a critical area,
 critical dune area, coastal park, wildlife management area or
 preserve, or gulf beach and a state agency contested the agency's
 consistency determination in a formal hearing; or
 (2)  if the proposed action is one for which a formal
 hearing under Chapter 2001, Government Code, is not available to
 contest the agency's determination, the action exceeds the
 applicable thresholds.
 (e)  The commissioner [council] must consider and act on a
 matter referred under Subsection (c) or (d) before the 26th day
 after the date the agency or subdivision proposed the action. For
 purposes of this section, an action subject to the contested case
 provisions of Chapter 2001, Government Code, is proposed when
 notice of a decision or order is issued under Section 2001.142,
 Government Code.
 (f)  The commissioner [council] by rule shall establish a
 process by which an applicant for a permit or other proposed action
 described in Section 33.2053, or an agency or subdivision proposing
 an action, may request and receive a preliminary consistency
 review. The rules shall:
 (1)  create a permitting assistance group composed of
 representatives of committee [council] member agencies and other
 interested committee [council] members to coordinate the
 preliminary reviews; and
 (2)  require that the following written information be
 produced not later than the 45th day after the date of the request
 for preliminary review:
 (A)  a statement from each agency or subdivision
 required to permit or approve the project as to whether the agency
 or subdivision anticipates approving or denying the application;
 (B)  if an agency or subdivision intends to deny
 an application, the agency's or subdivision's explanation of the
 grounds for denial and recommendations for resolving the grounds in
 a way that would allow the application to be approved;
 (C)  if enough information is already available, a
 preliminary finding as to whether the project is likely to be found
 consistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program; and
 (D)  if the project is likely to be found
 inconsistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program, an explanation and recommendation for resolving the
 inconsistency in a way that would allow the project to be found
 consistent.
 (f-1)  Not later than January 1, 2012, the commissioner shall
 evaluate the functions, including any pending initiatives,
 membership, and usefulness of the permitting assistance group
 established under Subsection (f). The evaluation must include
 input from all members of the permitting assistance group and the
 committee.  This subsection expires April 1, 2012.
 (f-2)  The commissioner may adopt rules as necessary to:
 (1)  restructure or abolish the permitting assistance
 group;
 (2)  expand the functions of the permitting assistance
 group; or
 (3)  add members to the permitting assistance group.
 (g)  The commissioner [council] by rule shall establish a
 process by which an individual or small business may request and
 receive assistance with filing applications for permits or other
 proposed actions described by Section 33.2053. The rules shall
 provide for:
 (1)  the coordination of preapplication assistance
 through the permitting assistance group; and
 (2)  the provision of the following, by the permitting
 assistance group, to an individual or a small business, on request:
 (A)  a list of the permits or other approvals
 necessary for the project;
 (B)  a simple, understandable statement of all
 permit requirements;
 (C)  a coordinated schedule for each agency's or
 subdivision's decision on the action;
 (D)  a list of all the information the agencies or
 subdivisions need to declare the applications for the permits or
 other approvals administratively complete;
 (E)  assistance in completing the applications as
 needed; and
 (F)  if enough information is already available, a
 preliminary finding as to whether the project is likely to be found
 consistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program.
 (h)  If an agency, subdivision, or applicant has received a
 preliminary finding of consistency under Subsection (f)(2)(C) or
 (g)(2)(F) and a request for referral was filed on that action under
 Subsection (c)(2), the commissioner [council] may accept the
 request for referral only if the agency or subdivision has
 substantially changed the permit or proposed action since the
 preliminary finding was issued.
 SECTION 12.  Subsection (e), Section 33.2051, Natural
 Resources Code, is amended to read as follows:
 (e)  The commissioner [council] may not review a proposed
 rule of the [Texas] Department of Agriculture.
 SECTION 13.  Section 33.2052, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.2052.  CERTIFICATION OF AGENCY RULES; AGENCY ACTIONS
 CONSIDERED CONSISTENT. (a)  The commissioner [council] by rule
 shall establish and may modify a process by which an agency may
 submit rules and rule amendments described by Section 33.2051 to
 the commissioner [council] for review and certification for
 consistency with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program.
 (b)  The process must provide that an agency may submit to
 the commissioner [council] consistency review thresholds for the
 agency's actions described in Section 33.2053. After the
 commissioner [council] certifies that an agency's rules are
 consistent and approves the agency's thresholds, the agency's
 consistency determination under Section 33.205(b) for an action is
 final and is not subject to referral and review, except as provided
 by Section 33.205(d).
 (c)  The commissioner [council] by rule shall provide that
 the commissioner [council] may revoke a [its] certification under
 Subsection (b) if the commissioner [council] finds that an agency
 has:
 (1)  implemented certified rules in a manner that
 conflicts with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program; or
 (2)  amended certified rules in a manner inconsistent
 with the goals and policies of the coastal management program.
 SECTION 14.  Subsections (j) and (k), Section 33.2053,
 Natural Resources Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (j)  An action to renew, amend, or modify an existing permit,
 certificate, lease, easement, approval, or other action is not an
 action under this section if the action is taken under a rule that
 the commissioner [council] has certified under Section 33.2052 and:
 (1)  for a wastewater discharge permit, if the action
 is not a major permit modification that would:
 (A)  increase pollutant loads to coastal waters;
 or
 (B)  result in relocation of an outfall to a
 critical area;
 (2)  for solid, hazardous, or nonhazardous waste
 permits, if the action is not a Class III modification under rules
 of the Texas [Natural Resource Conservation] Commission on
 Environmental Quality; or
 (3)  for any other action, if the action:
 (A)  only extends the period of the existing
 authorization and does not authorize new or additional work or
 activity; or
 (B)  is not directly relevant to Sections
 33.205(a) and (b).
 (k)  The commissioner [council] shall establish a program
 boundary to limit the geographic area in which the requirements of
 Sections 33.205(a) and (b) apply. The boundary is the coastal
 facility designation line as defined by Appendix 1 to 31 TAC Section
 19.2 as that appendix existed on the effective date of this section,
 as modified by Section 33.203(7). Except as provided by
 Subsections (f)(8)-(10), this subchapter does not apply to an
 agency action authorizing an activity outside the program boundary.
 SECTION 15.  Section 33.206, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.206.  [COUNCIL] ACTION BY COMMISSIONER OR ATTORNEY
 GENERAL. (a)  A proposed action is consistent with the goals and
 policies of the coastal management program and approved by the
 commissioner [council] unless[, on the affirmative vote of at least
 two-thirds of the members of the council,] the commissioner
 [council] determines the action to be inconsistent with the coastal
 management program and protests the action.
 (b)  If the commissioner [council] protests the proposed
 action, the commissioner [council] shall report the commissioner's
 [its] findings on the matter to the agency or subdivision. The
 report shall specify how the proposed action is inconsistent with
 the goals and policies of the coastal management program and
 include specific recommendations of the commissioner [council]
 regarding how the proposed action may be modified or amended to make
 it consistent with the program. Before the 21st day after the date
 the agency or subdivision receives the report, the agency or
 subdivision shall review the findings and recommendations and
 determine whether to modify or amend the proposed action to make it
 consistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program and shall notify the commissioner [council] of its
 decision.
 (c)  If an agency or subdivision does not modify or amend a
 proposed action to be consistent with the goals and policies of the
 coastal management program, the commissioner [council] shall
 request the attorney general to issue an opinion on the consistency
 of the proposed action with the coastal management program. The
 agency or subdivision is stayed from taking the proposed action
 until the attorney general issues the opinion. The attorney
 general shall issue an opinion before the 26th day after the date
 the commissioner [council] requests the opinion.
 (d)  The commissioner [council] shall adopt guidance and
 procedural rules for the review of federal actions, activities, and
 outer continental shelf plans that incorporate the provisions of
 federal regulations governing those reviews. The guidance and
 rules shall provide that the commissioner [chair] or any three
 committee members may request additional information from a federal
 agency or additional time for review as provided by the federal
 regulations.
 (e)  The commissioner [council] shall review any [federal]
 action, activity, or outer continental shelf plan that any three
 committee members [of the council] agree presents a significant
 unresolved issue regarding consistency with the goals and policies
 of the coastal management program [and place the matter on the
 agenda of a meeting of the council for review].
 (f)  [If an activity requiring an agency or subdivision
 action described by Section 33.2053 that falls below thresholds in
 effect under Section 33.2052 also requires an equivalent federal
 permit or license, the council may only determine the agency or
 subdivision action's consistency.] If an activity requiring an
 agency or subdivision action described by Section 33.2053 that
 falls above thresholds in effect under Section 33.2052 also
 requires an equivalent federal permit or license, the commissioner
 [council] may determine the consistency of the agency or
 subdivision action or the federal license or permit, but not both.
 The determination regarding the consistency of an action made by
 the commissioner [council] under this subsection constitutes the
 state's determination regarding consistency of the equivalent
 agency or subdivision action or federal action.
 (g)  Notwithstanding the other provisions of this
 subchapter, the commissioner may not determine whether a proposed
 action of the land office, the commissioner, or the board is
 consistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program. The commissioner shall refer a request for a review of the
 consistency of such an action to the attorney general not later than
 the second day after the date the commissioner receives the
 request. The attorney general shall determine whether the action
 is consistent with the goals and policies of the coastal management
 program in accordance with the applicable provisions of this
 subchapter governing determinations by the commissioner. If the
 attorney general determines the action to be inconsistent with the
 goals and policies of the coastal management program, the attorney
 general may protest the action in accordance with the provisions of
 this subchapter governing protests by the commissioner. A protest
 by the attorney general has the same effect as a protest by the
 commissioner. The attorney general may adopt rules as necessary to
 implement this subsection [If, after review, the council finds a
 proposed federal agency action or activity or outer continental
 shelf plan is inconsistent with the coastal management program, and
 the federal agency does not modify the action, activity, or outer
 continental shelf plan to achieve consistency with the program, the
 governor, with the assistance of the chair of the council, may seek
 mediation of the matter in accordance with federal law].
 [(h)     The council may not protest a proposed action by an
 agency or subdivision pertaining to an application filed with that
 agency or subdivision before the date the coastal management
 program is adopted.]
 SECTION 16.  Section 33.207, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.207.  COMMISSIONER [COUNCIL] RECOMMENDATIONS. In
 addition to the report required by Section 33.206, the commissioner
 [council]:
 (1)  may periodically submit recommendations to an
 agency or subdivision designed to encourage the agency or
 subdivision to carry out its functions in a manner consistent with
 the coastal management program, including recommendations for
 methods to simplify governmental procedures and changes in
 applicable rules or statutes; and
 (2)  shall report to the legislature on:
 (A)  recommended statutory changes needed to make
 more effective and efficient use of public funds and provide for
 more effective and efficient management of coastal natural resource
 areas, including recommendations on methods to simplify
 governmental procedures;
 (B)  agency or subdivision actions that are not
 consistent with the coastal management program; and
 (C)  population growth of, infrastructure needs
 of, and use of resources on the coast.
 SECTION 17.  Subsections (b) and (c), Section 33.208,
 Natural Resources Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (b)  If the attorney general issues an opinion under Section
 33.206(c) that a proposed agency or subdivision action is
 inconsistent with the coastal management program and the agency or
 subdivision fails to implement the commissioner's [council's]
 recommendation regarding the action, the attorney general shall
 file suit in a district court of Travis County to enforce this
 subchapter. The court shall consider the attorney general's
 opinion in determining whether the proposed action is consistent
 with the coastal management program.
 (c)  Notwithstanding the request of an opinion from, or the
 filing of suit by, the attorney general, the commissioner [council]
 and the agency or subdivision may enter into a settlement agreement
 with regard to the proposed agency or subdivision action. If the
 commissioner [council] and the agency or subdivision enter into a
 settlement agreement, the commissioner [council] may rescind the
 commissioner's [its] request for an opinion from the attorney
 general.
 SECTION 18.  Section 33.209, Natural Resources Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 33.209.  PROHIBITION ON SPECIAL AREA MANAGEMENT PLANS.
 The land office [council] may not develop or approve a special area
 management plan, including a plan for an area designated under the
 national estuary program.
 SECTION 19.  The following provisions of the Natural
 Resources Code are repealed:
 (1)  Subdivision (13), Section 33.004;
 (2)  Subsection (c), Section 33.052;
 (3)  Subdivision (20), Section 33.203;
 (4)  Subsections (b), (c), and (d), Section 33.204;
 (5)  Section 33.2042;
 (6)  Section 33.2043;
 (7)  Section 33.2044;
 (8)  Section 33.2045;
 (9)  Subsection (g), Section 33.2053;
 (10)  Section 33.211; and
 (11)  Section 33.212.
 SECTION 20.  (a)  Effective September 1, 2011, the Coastal
 Coordination Council is abolished and the powers and duties of the
 council are transferred to the General Land Office in accordance
 with Chapter 33, Natural Resources Code, as amended by this Act.
 (b)  As soon as possible after the effective date of this
 Act, the presiding officers of the appropriate entities shall
 appoint the members of the Coastal Coordination Advisory Committee
 in accordance with Section 33.2041, Natural Resources Code, as
 amended by this Act.
 (c)  All rules of the Coastal Coordination Council are
 continued in effect as rules of the General Land Office until
 superseded by a rule of the land office. A certification issued by
 the council is continued in effect as provided by the law in effect
 immediately before the effective date of this Act. A complaint,
 investigation, contested case, or other proceeding pending on the
 effective date of this Act is continued without change in status
 after the effective date of this Act. An activity conducted by the
 council is considered to be an activity conducted by the land
 office.
 (d)  A reference in another law or an administrative rule to
 the Coastal Coordination Council means the General Land Office.
 (e)  On September 1, 2011, or as soon as is possible after
 that date, the commissioner of the General Land Office shall adopt a
 comprehensive plan to ensure the smooth transition of all programs
 operated by the Coastal Coordination Council before September 1,
 2011, from the council to the land office.  During the transition,
 the General Land Office shall consult with the National Oceanic and
 Atmospheric Administration as necessary to ensure continued
 compliance with federal requirements and to maintain federal
 approval of the Texas Coastal Management Program.
 (f)  All money, records, property, and equipment in the
 possession of the Coastal Coordination Council on September 1,
 2012, shall be transferred to the possession of the General Land
 Office on September 1, 2012, or as soon as possible after that date.
 SECTION 21.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.
 * * * * *