Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB78

Filed
 
Introduced
11/8/10  
Out of Senate Committee
3/7/11  
Voted on by Senate
3/17/11  
Out of House Committee
5/16/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Voted on by House
5/20/11  
Engrossed
3/17/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
3/30/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  
Enrolled
5/27/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to adverse licensing, listing, or registration decisions by certain health and human services agencies.

Impact

The bill will notably amend Chapter 531 of the Government Code by introducing Subchapter W, specifically targeting those agencies and institutions that provide health and human services. It facilitates the maintenance of records for denied applications and revoked licenses, requiring agencies to document and share such records with each other, ensuring comprehensive oversight across the regulatory landscape. This approach not only enhances transparency but also aims to prevent potential harm by making informed decisions about the suitability of service providers.

Summary

Senate Bill 78 pertains to the regulation of licensing, listing, or registration decisions made by certain health and human services agencies in Texas. The bill outlines specific criteria under which an agency can deny an application for a license or registration due to adverse decisions made against the applicant or associated individuals. This ensures a systematic approach to public safety by preventing individuals or entities with a history of negative agency decisions from operating in sensitive sectors such as healthcare and child services. The legislation aims to promote accountability and protect individuals receiving care by ensuring that only qualified providers are permitted to operate.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB78 revolve around the balance between strict regulatory oversight and the potential for overreach. Some critics argue that the bill may prevent capable providers from offering essential services due to historical decisions that might not accurately reflect their current capabilities. Additionally, there are concerns about the fairness of adjudicating licensing based on historical data, which could disproportionately impact certain demographics or establishments that have faced bureaucratic challenges in the past. Supporters, however, contend that prioritizing the safety and well-being of vulnerable populations must take precedence, reinforcing the need for stringent licensing protocols in the health and human services sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.