Texas Senate Bill SB926

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Refer: 3/8/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District No. 1; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

If enacted, SB926 would significantly affect local governance by creating a framework for the Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District to manage resources and infrastructure within its established boundaries. The district would be able to undertake various road projects and could secure funding through the issuance of bonds and the imposition of a tax on property owners within the district. Furthermore, the limited power of eminent domain allows the district to potentially acquire necessary land for public use related to its infrastructure goals.

Summary

SB926 proposes the establishment of the Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District No. 1 in Texas, which will have the authority to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited powers of eminent domain. This municipal utility district is intended to serve specific public purposes, mainly focusing on infrastructure improvements such as roads and drainage systems. The legislation outlines the governance structure, requiring elections for a board of directors and adherence to municipal consent ordinances to ensure local oversight and accountability.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB926 appear to reflect a generally positive sentiment among proponents who emphasize the importance of providing necessary infrastructure improvements and supporting community development. However, there are concerns regarding the implications of the district's powers, particularly around the use of eminent domain and how it might affect property owners and local autonomy. Stakeholders advocate for a careful balance between development needs and the rights of individuals affected by such powers.

Contention

Notable points of contention within SB926 include discussions on the extent of the district's authority, especially concerning the imposition of taxes and the use of eminent domain. Critics argue that while infrastructure development is crucial, the establishment of such a district may overextend governmental powers at the local level without adequate checks. Supporters counter that local utility districts are essential for effectively managing community resources and addressing development needs, thus making the bill a necessary measure for fostering growth and maintaining public services.