Texas Senate Bill SB928

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/24/11
• Refer: 3/8/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District No. 3; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The creation of Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District No. 3 is expected to have notable implications for local governance and resource management within its designated boundaries. By empowering the district with taxing authority and bond issuance capabilities, the bill will potentially enhance the availability of funding for critical projects aimed at improving public utilities and infrastructure. This measure is particularly relevant in areas experiencing growth or development pressures, where traditional funding mechanisms may be insufficient.

Summary

SB928 aims to establish the Pilot Knob Municipal Utility District No. 3 in Texas, providing it the authority to levy taxes, issue bonds, and grant limited powers of eminent domain. The bill is significant as it allows for the municipal utility district to manage essential public services, including road construction and maintenance, and drainage improvements. This district will encompass a specified area in Travis County, aiming to improve infrastructure in the region and address community development needs.

Sentiment

Responses to SB928 are expected to vary among different stakeholders. Proponents likely view the bill positively, as it aims to facilitate infrastructure development in underserved areas. They argue that establishing a dedicated municipal utility district can streamline the process for obtaining necessary funding to enhance local services. However, there may be concerns from critics about the implications of granting eminent domain powers and the level of local control that residents retain over such decisions.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB928 is the limited power of eminent domain that the district is granted. While it is designed to serve public purposes, stakeholders might argue about the risks of overreach, where the district could potentially infringe upon private property rights. Additionally, the requirement for municipal consent before the district can operate raises questions about the compatibility of the new district's objectives with existing municipal plans and zoning regulations.