Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SCR14

Introduced
2/3/11  

Caption

Affirming the pride of all Texans in both our one and indivisible national union and our one and indivisible state, claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist from certain mandates, and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.

Impact

The potential impact of SCR14 on state laws is significant, as it challenges existing funding frameworks that may not adequately support disadvantaged schools. If passed, the resolution could prompt legislative changes to ensure that school funding is aligned more closely with the needs of students and the communities they belong to. This could involve a reevaluation of the factors considered in the allocation of state education funds, ultimately aiming to create a more inclusive and equitable educational landscape across the state.

Summary

SCR14 is a resolution aimed at addressing funding inequities in state education systems. The bill emphasizes the need for a fair and equitable distribution of resources among school districts, particularly those serving low-income and marginalized communities. Advocates of SCR14 argue that the current funding model disproportionately disadvantages certain areas, leading to disparities in educational outcomes. The resolution seeks to highlight the importance of education as a right and a foundational element for community development and economic prosperity.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SCR14 is largely positive among education advocates and community organizations, who view it as a necessary step towards rectifying long-standing inequities in education funding. However, there are concerns among certain legislators about the feasibility of implementing the proposed changes and the fiscal implications for the state budget. The discussion often revolves around balancing fiscal responsibility with the ethical obligation to provide all children with a quality education, indicating a nuanced debate over education funding priorities.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SCR14 include debates over how to effectively measure equity in education funding and the potential resistance from stakeholders who benefit from the current funding model. Critics argue that changes to the funding formula could create instability and uncertainty for school districts that have relied on established funding patterns. The resolution invites a broader discussion on equity in education, encouraging stakeholders to reconsider how resources are allocated in order to foster an educational environment that promotes success for all students.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV HB3332

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3330

Creating family court circuits and assigning the number of family court judges in each family court circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3329

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

NJ SCR72

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR73

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR83

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR96

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

CA ACA13

Voting thresholds.