Texas House Bill HB2107

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Facilities Commission; authorizing fees.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by reinforcing the structure and duties of the Texas Facilities Commission. It mandates that the commission develop several essential plans, including a Capitol Complex master plan that considers existing properties and future needs. Through the authorization of fees related to qualifying projects, the bill aims to provide a means for the commission to sustain its activities financially. The regulations set forth in HB2107 require a more structured approach to project management that aligns with the state’s objectives and financial interests, potentially leading to more efficient use of state resources in facility management.

Summary

House Bill 2107 relates to the continuation and functions of the Texas Facilities Commission and authorizes fees for its operations. The bill includes significant amendments to various sections of the Government Code, establishing new requirements for the commission regarding the planning and oversight of state property. A primary function of the commission emphasized in the bill is the creation and implementation of a comprehensive capital improvement and deferred maintenance plan addressing the needs of state buildings. This effort intends to ensure that maintenance issues do not hinder the state's operational capacity and that facilities are adequately funded for improvements and necessary repairs.

Contention

While the bill purports to streamline operations and enhance the efficiency of state property management, it may raise concerns about the effect on local governance and project accountability. Critics might question the effectiveness of the Texas Facilities Commission in handling additional responsibilities, specifically regarding oversight and the management of public-private partnerships. The requirement for alternative dispute resolution and negotiated rule-making procedures also prompts discussions about how disputes will be handled and whether these mechanisms are robust enough to protect state interests.