Texas House Bill HB2919

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/4/09
• Voted on by House: 5/14/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 6/1/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the regulation of land use and the creation of regional military sustainability commissions to ensure compatible development with military installations in certain areas.

Impact

The legislation empowers regional military sustainability commissions to establish standards for compatible development in territories surrounding military installations. This means that any new permits for construction or development must pass a review by the commission to assess their compatibility with military operations. The bill emphasizes collaboration between local authorities and military representatives to promote land use policies that safeguard national security while supporting community growth. This model attempts to balance the needs of military operations with local development initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 2919 introduces the creation of regional military sustainability commissions aimed at facilitating compatible land development adjacent to military installations in Texas. The bill seeks to address the challenges posed by residential and commercial developments that may hinder the operational efficacy of military bases. It mandates local government entities in close proximity to military bases to consider military operations when proposing new ordinances or development plans, thereby ensuring that new projects in their jurisdictions do not interfere with military missions and training activities.

Contention

While HB 2919 is supported as a necessary measure to protect military interests, some critics argue that it may impose limitations on local governments' ability to regulate land use independently. The requirement for extensive consultation with military authorities may complicate the approval processes for local developments and could lead to tensions between local interests and military priorities. Additionally, opponents express concern that these commissions might prioritize military needs over community development, potentially stifling residential and economic growth in the areas surrounding these installations.