Texas House Bill HB2279

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to motorcycle training and the license requirements for a three-wheeled motorcycle; creating an offense.

Impact

This change in law would directly affect how motorcycle training programs are structured in Texas. It mandates that only those training programs approved by the department can provide instruction for compensation, thereby ensuring a level of quality and standardized training across the state. The ramifications include stricter oversight and potential legal consequences for unlicensed training providers, classified as a Class B misdemeanor for first offenses and escalating to a Class A misdemeanor upon subsequent violations.

Summary

House Bill 2279 seeks to amend existing laws regarding motorcycle training and the licensing requirements specifically for operating three-wheeled motorcycles. The bill stipulates that applicants for a Class M license, or a Class A, B, or C driver's license authorizing motorcycle operation, must provide proof of completing a motorcycle operator training course that is approved by the state. Importantly, the new provisions focus on customizing the training specifically for three-wheeled motorcycle operation, enhancing the safety and competency of riders needing this specific licensing category.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2279 appears to be informed by a growing recognition of the importance of safety training among motorcycle riders, particularly given the specific challenges associated with operating three-wheeled motorcycles. Advocates argue that the bill promotes better training standards which could lead to fewer accidents and improved road safety. However, some critics may express concern over the additional regulations imposed on training programs, potentially viewing this as an overreach or unnecessary burden on trainers.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions about HB 2279 likely revolve around the balance between ensuring safety through proper training and the potential implications for training program operators. Specifically, the requirement for state approval could be seen as restrictive, potentially limiting who can train motorcycle operators and drawing criticism from those who believe the market should dictate training standards. Additionally, there could be debates about the effectiveness of such regulations in actually improving rider safety outcomes.