Relating to the review of certain rules of state agencies.
Impact
The implementation of HB 2948 would modify the process by which state agency rules are proposed and evaluated, as it mandates an additional layer of analysis before any new rule can be enacted. This change could lead to a reduction in the number of rules that take effect, especially if the financial analyses indicate adverse impacts. Furthermore, the bill allows for the rescission of rules if their costs outweigh benefits or if they negatively affect employment, potentially enhancing the responsiveness of state governance to the economic landscape.
Summary
House Bill 2948 focuses on the review and analysis of certain rules established by state agencies. The bill introduces provisions that require a financial analysis to be conducted for each proposed rule, ensuring that the potential economic impacts are scrutinized before rules come into effect. Such analyses aim to evaluate the costs and benefits of proposed rules, taking into account their effects on consumer protection, worker safety, environmental impacts, employment rates, reliability of energy transmission, and the competitiveness of businesses within the state.
Sentiment
Discussions around HB 2948 appear to be largely supportive, particularly from factions prioritizing fiscal responsibility and business interests. Proponents argue that the requirement for financial analysis would prevent unnecessary regulatory burdens on businesses and help safeguard economic vitality. Conversely, some may view the bill as potentially limiting regulatory authority, which could be contentious among those who believe in strong protective regulations for consumers and the environment.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 2948 include the balance it seeks to establish between regulation and economic interest. While supporters champion the intention to promote cost-effective regulatory practices, opponents argue that such measures might strip necessary protections meant to safeguard environmental standards and worker conditions. The focus on financial analysis could prioritize budgetary concerns over essential regulatory functions, raising debates about the overall governance philosophy and the role of state agencies in public welfare.
Relating to a requirement that certain rules proposed by state agencies in the executive branch of state government be approved by certain elected state officials.
Relating to the terminology used in statute to refer to intellectual disability and certain references to abolished health and human services agencies.