Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3227

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to coverage of certain eating disorders as serious mental illnesses under certain group health benefit plans.

Impact

The bill's implementation will potentially increase access to necessary treatment for individuals suffering from eating disorders, reducing the financial burden associated with care for both patients and families. It is expected to create a more equitable healthcare landscape where treatment for eating disorders is recognized and treated with the same urgency as other serious mental illnesses. The regulation of these specific conditions may further promote awareness and support for those affected, fostering a more informed public discourse around mental health as a whole.

Summary

House Bill 3227 aims to amend the Insurance Code of Texas to classify certain eating disorders—specifically anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and unspecified eating disorders—as serious mental illnesses (SMI) under group health benefit plans. By doing so, the bill mandates that group health plans must provide coverage for the treatment of these conditions similar to other serious mental illnesses that are already recognized. This change arises from growing concerns about the prevalence and serious consequences of these eating disorders and the need for comprehensive treatment options that align with other mental health conditions.

Conclusion

If passed, HB 3227 will take effect statewide, expanding the definition of SMI to encompass a broader range of mental health issues and providing critical support for an often marginalized area of mental health treatment. The bill reflects an evolving understanding of mental health and the importance of comprehensive care, while also underscoring the need to balance such expansions with fiscal realities within the healthcare system.

Contention

Despite its aims, HB 3227 has faced opposition primarily concerning the financial implications for insurance providers. Critics argue that mandating additional coverage for eating disorders could lead to escalating costs for health benefit plans, which might be passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums. Additionally, there are concerns among some legislators about the adequacy of existing coverage frameworks and whether they truly meet the needs of those with eating disorders. The need for a thorough assessment by the Sunset Advisory Commission has been emphasized, ensuring that the introduction of this coverage does not inadvertently lead to adverse effects on overall health plan affordability or accessibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.