Texas House Bill HCR123

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Urging the United States Congress to revise Department of Homeland Security funding formulas for Targeted Infrastructure Capability grants to include a separate threat assessment for strategically located border communities, irrespective of population.

Impact

If adopted, HCR123 could lead to a substantial change in how federal funding is allocated, especially for border towns that play a critical role in national security but currently do not meet the population criteria for grant eligibility. By ensuring that these areas receive appropriate financial resources, the resolution aims to enhance their readiness and ability to address security threats, particularly those involving hazardous materials and emergency response situations. The emphasis on border security and infrastructure means that such changes could ultimately reinforce the nation's critical infrastructure along the borders.

Summary

HCR123 is a concurrent resolution from the 83rd Legislature of the State of Texas, urging the United States Congress to revise the funding formulas utilized by the Department of Homeland Security for Targeted Infrastructure Capability grants. The bill specifically advocates for the inclusion of a separate threat assessment for strategically located border communities, regardless of their population size. This is significant as many border cities, such as Laredo, face national security responsibilities yet are often overlooked due to their smaller populations. The resolution highlights the unique challenges these communities experience in terms of funding and security.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR123 appears to be supportive among those who understand the complexities and responsibilities of border communities. Legislators who back the bill view it as a necessary measure to ensure that critical areas receive the funding and support they require to manage emerging threats. However, there may also be concerns from those skeptical of increasing federal funding or those who question the effectiveness of existing funding formulas. As discussions progress, the sentiment may reflect broader debates on security, immigration, and federal-state relations.

Contention

Notably, as the resolution emphasizes revising funding formulas, some contention may arise regarding the criteria for evaluating threats and the allocation process of federal programs. Critics might raise questions about how effectively these threat assessments can be conducted and whether all border communities would benefit equally. Additionally, there could be discussions around the implications of adjusting federal oversight in local security funding, potentially impacting community autonomy and their individual needs.