Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1122

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a prohibition against the use of certain sprays, stun guns, and Tasers by school district peace officers, security personnel, and other employees against public school students.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would amend existing educational codes in Texas, particularly by adding Section 37.0814 to Chapter 37 of the Education Code. This modification would directly impact the operational procedures of school districts in the state, mandating that educational institutions move away from using forceful methods to manage student behavior. As a result, it could lead to a major shift in how schools handle disciplinary issues, with a focus on non-violent resolutions and conflict de-escalation techniques.

Summary

SB1122 aims to establish a prohibition against the use of certain non-lethal weapons, such as OC spray, stun guns, and Tasers, by school district peace officers, security personnel, and other employees against public school students. The bill seeks to enhance student safety and protect their rights while attending school or school-related activities. By disallowing these methods of restraint, the legislation emphasizes alternative approaches to student management and discipline, promoting a safer educational environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1122 appears to be generally positive among advocates of student welfare and safety. Supporters argue that prohibiting the use of harmful restraint techniques is necessary for creating nurturing educational environments. However, there may be concerns among school safety advocates regarding how schools can adequately protect themselves without the use of these non-lethal measures. The bill raises questions about balancing student rights with the need for effective disciplinary methods.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB1122 may arise from the debate over how to ensure school safety while respecting student freedoms. Critics of the bill could argue that in certain situations, the use of non-lethal weapons could be necessary for the protection of staff and students. This conflict highlights the ongoing discussion about the best approaches to school discipline and safety, with varying opinions on the role of force and restraint in educational settings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.