Relating to standards and procedures for determining whether a person who owns, operates, or manages a pipeline is a common carrier.
Impact
If enacted, SB1625 would significantly reshape the legal landscape for pipeline operators in Texas. It introduces specific requirements for applications to operate as common carriers, including detailed descriptions of the pipeline's purpose, customer affiliations, and the substances transported. Moreover, by affirmatively incorporating mechanisms for public participation through notifications and the ability to contest determinations, the bill not only reinforces public oversight but also affirms the rights of landowners affected by pipeline constructions.
Summary
SB1625 is a legislative initiative designed to establish clearer standards and procedures for determining whether entities that own, operate, or manage pipelines qualify as common carriers in Texas. The bill aims to refine the existing definitions and regulatory frameworks under the Natural Resources Code, particularly in how common carriers are identified and what obligations they must fulfill. It attempts to enhance transparency in the pipeline's operation while ensuring accountability in the industry, particularly concerning the transportation of crude petroleum, carbon dioxide, and other substances.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SB1625 appears mixed, reflecting both support and opposition among stakeholders. Proponents, including some lawmakers and industry representatives, argue that clear standards are necessary for streamlining operations and enhancing regulatory oversight, which could potentially lead to safer and more efficient transportation systems. However, critics raise concerns that the bill might grant excessive power to pipeline operators under the guise of common carrier status, potentially undermining landowner rights and local control over land use.
Contention
Notably, contention regarding SB1625 centers on the balance between industry growth and local landowner rights. Key points of contention include the implications of granting eminent domain powers to operators classified as common carriers and how this might impact communities through which pipelines are constructed. Critics argue that while fostering economic growth through pipeline operations is essential, it should not come at the expense of individual property rights and local governance.
Relating to the consideration of ownership interests of certain persons in determining whether a business is a historically underutilized business for purposes of state contracting.
Relating to the consideration of ownership interests of certain persons in determining whether a business is a historically underutilized business for purposes of state contracting.
Relating to the consideration of ownership interests of certain persons with a disability in determining whether a business is a historically underutilized business for purposes of state contracting.
Relating to the issuance of a permit by the Public Utility Commission of Texas for the routing of certain oil or gas pipelines; authorizing administrative penalties.
Relating to the creation of the Dallas Municipal Management District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the creation of the Dallas Municipal Management District; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the ownership of the pore space underlying the surface of land and to the use of that space for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide; authorizing a fee.