Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB82

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to prohibited deceptive or disenfranchising practices regarding an election; providing penalties.

Impact

If enacted, the provisions of SB82 will necessitate changes in existing election procedures, focusing on the accountability of election officers. The bill expands upon the Election Code by incorporating new sections that define prohibited practices and the associated penalties. Importantly, the bill emphasizes the responsibility of the Secretary of State to report violations and pursue corrective actions, which could lead to greater scrutiny of election conduct across the state. The implementation of this bill could alter how elections are administered, particularly in areas where previous issues with voter eligibility and deceptive practices have occurred.

Summary

SB82 introduces measures aimed at preventing deceptive and disenfranchising practices in elections. Specifically, it criminalizes actions by election officers that unlawfully restrict an eligible voter's right to vote, such as removing names from voter registration lists or preventing ballot deposits. The bill establishes that these offenses could lead to serious penalties, including state jail felonies for election officers who knowingly infringe upon voters' rights. By outlining specific actions deemed illegal, the bill aims to enhance voter protection and strengthen election integrity laws in Texas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB82 appears mixed, with strong support from advocates of election integrity and voter protection, who view it as a necessary step to combat deceptive practices and enhance electoral participation. However, there are concerns from some groups about potential overreach and the implications of imposing criminal penalties on election officials. Critics may argue that these changes could lead to unintended consequences, such as discouraging election workers from performing their duties out of fear of legal repercussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate around the balance between protecting voter rights and ensuring that election officials are not subjected to excessive penalties for potential mistakes. Proponents of SB82 assert that stringent measures are essential to prevent voter disenfranchisement, especially in a political climate where such concerns have been raised. Conversely, some lawmakers and advocacy groups caution that the bill could inadvertently penalize officials for honest errors, thus exacerbating challenges within the electoral system. This legislative measure aims to navigate these complexities while maintaining public confidence in the electoral process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (RR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

CA AB1044

Elections: Secretary of State.

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB1206

Voter registration database: Electronic Registration Information Center.

CA SB297

Elections: initiatives and referenda: withdrawal.

CA AB1004

Secretary of State: voter information Internet Web site.

CA AB2050

Voter registration database: Electronic Registration Information Center