Texas Senate Bill SR117

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Recognizing the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.

Impact

The resolution itself does not alter state laws but emphasizes the need for policies that focus on cancer research and prevention. It acknowledges the crucial role of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network in mobilizing community efforts, such as organizing Relay For Life events statewide, aimed at raising public awareness and engaging local communities in advocacy efforts. The passage of SR117 may lead to heightened attention to cancer-related issues in future legislative sessions, encouraging supportive measures for cancer research funding and healthcare initiatives.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 117 (SR117) recognizes the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network for its outstanding work and dedication toward combating cancer in Texas. The resolution highlights the organization’s efforts to advocate for laws and policies that prioritize cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer continues to be a major public health issue, being the second-leading cause of death in the United States and imposing significant economic costs nationwide. The resolution serves to publicly commend the organization's contributions and reinforce the importance of cancer advocacy in state health policy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR117 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, reflecting broad support among legislators for the work of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. The resolution aligns with a growing recognition of the need for proactive measures against cancer. By conveying an appreciation for the organization’s advocacy, it fosters a collaborative spirit between state legislators and health organizations in the fight against cancer, portraying a united front on this critical public health matter.

Contention

While SR117 is a non-binding resolution and thus does not evoke significant contention, it may raise questions about funding priorities and how advocacy organizations influence public health policy. Although there were no notable points of opposition within the context of this resolution, ongoing debates in related legislative discussions may center around the allocation of state resources for cancer research versus other health concerns. The resolution reinforces the narrative that cancer should be a top priority, but differing views on health policy funding could emerge in future legislative proposals.