Relating to the failure to handle certain animals in accordance with rules of the Texas Animal Health Commission; amending provisions subject to a criminal penalty.
Impact
If enacted, HB2311 would reinforce the authority of the Texas Animal Health Commission by holding individuals accountable for their failure to manage animals in accordance with state regulations. This change is particularly significant as it outlines specific criminal offenses associated with neglect or improper care of animals, thereby helping to mitigate the spread of diseases that could affect livestock and poultry populations. It establishes a legal framework for prosecuting such offenses, which signifies a more stringent approach to animal health in Texas.
Summary
House Bill 2311 seeks to ensure the proper handling of certain animals as mandated by the Texas Animal Health Commission. The bill specifically addresses failures to adhere to the established rules regarding livestock, exotic livestock, domestic fowl, and exotic fowl that are either infected or exposed to diseases. In doing so, the bill amends existing provisions related to criminal penalties for noncompliance, aiming to provide a clearer enforcement mechanism for animal health protocols.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB2311 reflects a consensus on the need for robust animal health regulations. Advocates of the bill view it as a necessary measure to safeguard public and animal health, emphasizing its role in preventing outbreaks of livestock diseases. However, there may be opposing views regarding the implications of criminal penalties, particularly among those who argue for more education and support for farmers and ranchers rather than punitive measures.
Contention
One point of contention that has emerged from discussions about HB2311 is the potential impact on smaller or independent operators who may lack the resources to fully comply with stringent rules. Critics argue that the criminal penalty aspect of the bill could disproportionately affect these individuals, leading to calls for a more balanced approach that includes both enforcement and educational initiatives to assist in compliance with animal health standards.
Identical
Relating to the failure to handle certain animals in accordance with rules of the Texas Animal Health Commission; amending provisions subject to a criminal penalty.
Relating to the possession of dangerous wild animals and live nonindigenous snakes in certain counties and municipalities; increasing criminal penalties.
Relating to catalytic converters, including criminal conduct involving catalytic converters; providing an administrative penalty; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty; increasing a fee.
Relating to catalytic converters, including criminal conduct involving catalytic converters; providing an administrative penalty; creating a criminal offense; increasing a criminal penalty; increasing a fee.