Texas House Bill HB2919

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to an energy efficiency pilot program for state-owned buildings operated by the Texas Facilities Commission.

Impact

If implemented, the pilot program allows the State Energy Conservation Office to make or guarantee loans that support enhancing energy efficiency in state facilities. This aims to encourage state entities to undertake energy-saving projects that can lead to significant reductions in utility expenses over time. Moreover, the savings generated from these improvements could be allocated solely to the respective governmental entities that own the buildings, thereby creating a direct financial incentive for each state agency involved.

Summary

House Bill 2919 establishes an energy efficiency pilot program aimed at improving the energy performance of state-owned buildings managed by the Texas Facilities Commission. The bill mandates that the Energy Systems Laboratory at Texas A&M, in collaboration with state agencies, create a framework for providing loans that will finance energy improvement measures. The bill stipulates that the projected savings from utility costs must yield a return of 30% on the financing costs associated with the improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2919 reflects a progressive approach to state energy management, promoting sustainability and financial efficiency. Supporters of the bill see it as a vital step in addressing energy costs while enhancing the performance of public state infrastructure. However, concerns may arise regarding the initial upfront costs and the actual realization of the projected savings, leading to a divergence of opinions among stakeholders on the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed program.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the structuring of the loan program and the effectiveness of guaranteed savings. Critics may argue that ensuring a 30% return might be overly ambitious or impractical, questioning how the program will measure success. Additionally, the expiration date of the pilot program in 2020 may lead some legislators to see it as a temporary measure with potential long-term implications not fully planned out. The pilot character may also raise questions about its sustainability once the program concludes.