Texas House Bill HB3215

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to requirements regarding the withdrawal by certain insurers from the market for certain lines of insurance.

Impact

The legislation has implications for both insurers and consumers. For insurers, it introduces a level of regulatory oversight that requires them to consider the impact of their decisions on the market and on individual policyholders. By requiring a withdrawal plan, the bill aims to minimize disruptions in the insurance market, potentially protecting consumers from sudden and unplanned shifts in insurance availability. The intent is to create a more stable market environment where policyholders can rely on their insurers meeting contractual obligations even during transitions in insurer participation.

Summary

House Bill 3215 aims to establish a structured framework for insurance companies that intend to withdraw from specific lines of insurance, particularly within the property and casualty sector. The bill mandates that insurers planning to reduce their premium volume significantly must file a plan with the insurance commissioner. This is intended to ensure that the withdrawal process is orderly and considers the interests of policyholders and claimants in the state. Specifically, the bill triggers requirements when an insurer intends to reduce its total annual premium volume by 50% or more, or withdraw entirely from the market while controlling a significant portion of its insurance premiums.

Contention

Despite its consumer protection goals, there is criticism surrounding HB3215, particularly regarding the potential burdens it may impose on insurers. Opponents argue that the requirement for withdrawal plans may deter some companies from participating in the market or lead to higher costs for consumers. Moreover, concerns have been raised about whether the regulatory framework proposed in the bill could be excessively stringent, stifling competition and innovation in the insurance sector over time. These points of contention stem from a broader debate on the balance between consumer protection and maintaining a vibrant, competitive insurance market.