Texas House Bill HB3390

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to a written agreement concerning a projectile discharged from a firearm that travels across a property line; amending a provision subject to a criminal penalty.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3390 is expected to amend the Parks and Wildlife Code, specifically enhancing the legal framework governing firearms discharges across property lines. By mandating a written agreement, the bill seeks to prevent potential disputes between property owners related to stray projectiles from hunting activities. Moreover, this statute may provide clear legal recourse in instances of negligence or property damage due to unauthorized projectile discharges, thereby fostering a safer environment for both shooters and neighboring residents.

Summary

House Bill 3390 pertains to the regulations surrounding the discharge of projectiles from firearms that cross property lines. This legislation requires a written agreement to be established between property owners on either side of the boundary where a projectile may travel. The agreement must contain specific details such as the names and contact information of the involved parties, the identification of the neighboring properties, and signatures from property owners. The main objective of this bill is to formalize the permissions necessary for hunting or recreational shooting activities that may pose risks to adjacent property owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 3390 appeared largely positive among stakeholders concerned with hunting safety and property rights. Supporters believe that the bill addresses a necessary gap in legislation by ensuring that property owners are informed and consenting to such activities. However, there may be segments of the community that express concerns regarding the practicality of enforcing such agreements, particularly in rural areas where property lines can be expansive and boundary discussions may be challenging.

Contention

While the bill gained broad support during its legislative session—with all recorded votes in favor—there remains the potential for contention as it relates to enforcement and compliance. Some property owners may be resistant to formal agreements or may not feel that such measures are necessary, which could lead to pushback from those advocating for personal freedoms in recreational activities. Additionally, challenges could arise in establishing clear protocols for identifying and documenting property lines to prevent misunderstandings and legal disputes.